Sujet : Re: "big fat ignorant liar"
De : mikko.levanto (at) *nospam* iki.fi (Mikko)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 13. Jun 2025, 11:37:48
Autres entêtes
Organisation : -
Message-ID : <102gv1s$3cscf$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : Unison/2.2
On 2025-06-12 15:18:30 +0000, olcott said:
On 6/12/2025 3:23 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2025-06-11 14:34:41 +0000, olcott said:
On 6/11/2025 4:19 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2025-06-10 15:11:50 +0000, olcott said:
On 6/10/2025 6:15 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 6/9/25 8:34 PM, olcott wrote:
On 6/9/2025 7:16 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 6/9/25 3:16 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
"big fat ignorant liar" -- Damon
There are no words.
/Flibble
Can you show me wrong?
Or are you complaining about me telling him the truth?
What about this paper that I wrote?
Severe anthropogenic climate change proven entirely with verifiable facts
https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/336568434_Severe_anthropogenic_climate_change_proven_entirely_with_verifiable_facts
Which just shows you don't know the meaning of the word "prove".
What specifically do you believe is not proven?
The article makes no attempt to prove anything.
That is a dishonest or stupid thing to say.
On what page and line there is the end of the conclusion of
a proof?
Maybe you don't know what a verified fact is?
Irrepevant. Your question "What specifically do you believe is not
proven?" was about proofs, not about facts.
As you respond to my question without answering it it is
obvious that you don't see any proofs in your article.
-- Mikko
Re: "big fat ignorant liar"
Re: "big fat ignorant liar"