Liste des Groupes | Revenir à theory |
On 6/15/2025 4:46 AM, Mikko wrote:Nope, only someone as mentally deranged as yourself would believe your lies.On 2025-06-14 13:44:30 +0000, olcott said:Anyone with sufficient technical competence carefully
>On 6/14/2025 6:26 AM, Mikko wrote:>On 2025-06-13 17:59:23 +0000, André G. Isaak said:>
>On 2025-06-13 09:36, olcott wrote:>On 6/13/2025 6:53 AM, Mikko wrote:>>Nothing is permanent. But you can (and to some extent do) maintan a web>
page as long as you need it for usenet discussions.
I want people to be able to validate my work 50 years after I am dead.
A web-page will not work for this.
Usenet is dying. Do you seriously think it will be around in 50 years?
Some of its contents might still be on some web page.
Storing every text message ever written seems
to take < 1.0 TB.
Doesn't matter. Unlikely that anyone would even notice that you wanted
a validation of something.
>
studying what I have said that is not so biased against
my position that they can actually pay complete attention
will understand that I am correct.
If this was not the case then there could be a correctThere has been, but it has appearently been over you head.
rebuttal to what I am saying now. Instead of any correct
rebuttal all that has been provided is persistently
false assumptions.
A termination analyzer / partial halt decider isRight, and that sequence of states spedified by that input, is the sequence of states actually generated by that program when run, which since HHH(DDD) returns 0, that sequence of states will reach the final state.
required to report on the behavior of the sequence
of state transitions that its input actually specifies.
It is not allowed to report on anything else.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.