Sujet : Re: Final Statement on the Halting Problem
De : richard (at) *nospam* damon-family.org (Richard Damon)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 17. Jun 2025, 02:37:57
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <7fc74b850790f8ab99698ecd91e01a47a93a6e81@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 6/16/25 2:33 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jun 2025 12:49:48 +0300, Mikko wrote:
On 2025-06-15 13:55:15 +0000, Mr Flibble said:
>
The halting problem as defined ignores recursive self reference
focusing on the paradox instead, I would argue the recursive self
reference leads to infinite regress in the definition of the problem
thus creating a category error making the problem definition itself
ill-formed.
>
The final statement was already stated when the halting problem was
formulated and immediatley proved to be unsolvable. Both the problem and
the proof "ignore" paradoxes in the sense that there is none in either
of them.
BULLSHIT
/Flibble
Just you showing your stupidity.
Sorry that you disagree with FACTS, because you have decided to beleive in lies.