Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT

On 2025-06-28 12:42:07 +0000, olcott said:
 

On 6/28/2025 3:47 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:

Op 27.jun.2025 om 16:26 schreef olcott:

On 6/27/2025 1:42 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-06-27 04:21:01 +0000, olcott said:
>

On 6/26/2025 5:20 AM, Mikko wrote:>>>

In computer science the only measure of non-halting is the
possibility to execute an unlimited number of steps without
halting. An execution of a limited number of steps does not
count as non-haltign.

>
Halting means reaching a final halt state.

>
And non-halting means unlimited execution.
>

>
Not at all. The measure has always been can't possibly reach
final halt state. If it was not that way then smashing a
computer with a sledge hammer would "prove" that an infinite
loop halts.

>

Not at all. The measure is unlimited execution.

>
counter-factual

 If is not a matter of fact but a matter of convention. The only
relevant fact is that what I said really is the convention.