Liste des Groupes | Revenir à theory |
On 7/8/25 3:49 PM, olcott wrote:You must have dementia.On 7/8/2025 2:01 PM, Mike Terry wrote:Not a program, must include the code for HHH to be simulatable.>>
This is one of PO's practiced tactics - he makes a claim, and regardless of how patently false that claim appears, he refuses to logically defend the claim beyond saying "the claim is true, and if you understood xxx you would realise it is true".
>
All of my claims are easily verified facts to those
with the capacity to verify them.
>
void DDD()
{
HHH(DDD);
return;
}
>
_DDD()
[00002192] 55 push ebp
[00002193] 8bec mov ebp,esp
[00002195] 6892210000 push 00002192 // push DDD
[0000219a] e833f4ffff call 000015d2 // call HHH
[0000219f] 83c404 add esp,+04
[000021a2] 5d pop ebp
[000021a3] c3 ret
Size in bytes:(0018) [000021a3]
HHH is the test program.>But that DDD Can't be simulated by HHH without including the code that you refuse to accept is part of the input.
I am utterly shocked that you can't understand
that DDD emulated by HHH according to the semantics
of the x86 language cannot possibly reach past
it own machine address [0000219a].
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.