Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof

On 2025-07-09 14:16:44 +0000, olcott said:
 

On 7/9/2025 9:04 AM, joes wrote:

Am Wed, 09 Jul 2025 07:31:59 -0500 schrieb olcott:

On 7/9/2025 3:29 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-07-08 14:18:32 +0000, olcott said:

On 7/8/2025 2:41 AM, Mikko wrote:

>

True conclusion from false premeises is fairly common. But that is
not relevant.

It proves that logic is fundamentally incorrect on this point.
Logic must be a sequence of truth preserving operations or it is
wrong.

Should only false conclusions be derivable from false premises?

>
False premises must be immediately rejected.

 Often one must work with sentences that are not known to be true but
not known to be false, either.