Sujet : Re: The halting problem is self-contradictory De : 643-408-1753 (at) *nospam* kylheku.com (Kaz Kylheku) Groupes :comp.theory Date : 16. Oct 2025, 22:45:10 Autres entêtes Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID :<20251016143746.609@kylheku.com> References :123456789101112131415 User-Agent : slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux)
Basically everyone that disagrees with me is disagreeing with verified facts and they simply refuse to look at the verification.
Can you name /one/ concrete fact you have verified?
How have you verified it?
Please document your process.
Show that you initially assume that the claim is false, give all the possible reasons it might be false and then argue against each one of those reasons using rational evidence.
In the natural sciences, tational evidence refers to some observations or other results which have the property of being vanishingly improbable if the proposed hypothesis (thing being claimed to be a fact) is false.
In mathematics, the standard is higher: you have to show that certain results are absolutely impossible unless your hypothesis is true.
Show the above: document your actual verification process for one such alleged verified fact.
Note carefully: simply repeating your hypothesis and claiming everyone is not paying enhough attention or too dumb to see it as a fact is not a documented verification process. If that's what you plan to do in response, don't bother.