| Liste des Groupes | Revenir à theory |
On 10/19/2025 1:39 AM, Mikko wrote:Or a c function that takes a running process and examines it. Task manager? Inject into a running program? Viral activity?On 2025-10-18 10:47:45 +0000, olcott said:A c function that takes in source code? Has a built in compiler to start the process of compiling it?
>On 10/18/2025 3:58 AM, Mikko wrote:>On 2025-10-17 15:11:57 +0000, olcott said:>
>On 10/17/2025 3:45 AM, Mikko wrote:>On 2025-10-16 13:27:15 +0000, olcott said:>
>On 10/16/2025 4:34 AM, Mikko wrote:>On 2025-10-15 15:10:47 +0000, olcott said:>
>On 10/15/2025 9:50 AM, tTh wrote:>On 10/15/25 14:32, olcott wrote:>
>Here is that full proof.>
https://chatgpt.com/share/68eef2df-0f10-8011-8e92-264651cc518c
Can you take those insanity out of comp.lang.c ?
I just needed a couple of cross posts.
Here is how it is related to C/C++
There is nothing language specific in the halting problem.
It is just that the C code is fully operational
code that succinctly makes my point.
That it is C code is not essential to its purpose.
It makes my point 100% concrete and empirically testable.
One can't do that with the abstractions of Turing machines.
Of course you can. There are Turing machine simulators on the Web,
and making one's own is much easier than making one's own C
simulator.
Likewise you can mow your one acre lawn with
fingernail clippers.
Doable but even less sensible than writing programs in C.
>>You have not succeeded in presenting your point fully with C.>
Instead you have needed to discuss the machine code translation
of the C code. The core part of your "deciders" is a machine
code simulator, not a C code simulator. When you have presented
execution traces you have presented machine code traces, not
C traces.
This is the complete proof to anyone that knows the
semantics of C. Every LLM of five has validated it.
By the C rules there is no valid way to use programs as data.
Therefore
there is no way to implement your HHH without implementation defined
extensions that are not known to everyone that knows the semantics of
C. Also note that those who use C often don't know all about the
semantics specified by the latest C standard as the semantics of the
implementation they use is more important to them, and even that only
to the extent it is relevant to the purpose of whatever they are doing.
>
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.