Olcott admits that the Halting Problem is undecidable with the followingIt doesn't matter, Pete is nuts.
words quoted verbatim:
DD is the caller of HHH(DD) that does the opposite of whatever HHH(DD)/Flibble
reports. This makes it logically impossible for HHH to correctly report
on the behavior of its caller no matter what HHH does.
>
So if HHH is asked the question does my caller halt?
It is logically impossible for HHH to provide a correct answer.
You can argue about it for years, but he won't accept any of it.
| Date | Sujet | # | Auteur | |
| 23 Oct 25 |  Re: Olcott admits that the Halting Problem is undecidable | 4 | Bonita Montero | |
| 23 Oct 25 |  Re: Olcott admits that the Halting Problem is undecidable | 3 | olcott | |
| 23 Oct 25 |    Re: Olcott admits that the Halting Problem is undecidable | 1 | Chris M. Thomasson | |
| 23 Oct 25 | Re: Olcott admits that the Halting Problem is undecidable | 1 | Kaz Kylheku |
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.