Sujet : Re: Olcott admits that the Halting Problem is undecidable
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 23. Oct 2025, 15:45:12
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <10ddf1o$1qhjj$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 10/23/2025 6:01 AM, Bonita Montero wrote:
Am 26.09.2025 um 02:23 schrieb Mr Flibble:
Olcott admits that the Halting Problem is undecidable with the following
words quoted verbatim:
>
DD is the caller of HHH(DD) that does the opposite of whatever HHH(DD)
reports. This makes it logically impossible for HHH to correctly report
on the behavior of its caller no matter what HHH does.
>
So if HHH is asked the question does my caller halt?
It is logically impossible for HHH to provide a correct answer.
>
/Flibble
>
It doesn't matter, Pete is nuts.
You can argue about it for years, but he won't accept any of it.
Your comment meets the standard of defamation of character
-- Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
Haut de la page
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.
NewsPortal