Sujet : "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 24. Oct 2025, 00:14:28
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <10decsk$27k95$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 10/23/2025 4:34 PM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
On 2025-10-23, olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:
On 10/23/2025 3:13 AM, dart200 wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zkGk_A4noxI
>
>
That you are unable to pay close enough attention to
understand my proof is no error on my part.
I've never seen you present any body of statements
that even begins to look like a proof.
Because you always baselessly reject the first
step "there will still be a nested simulation tower"
that cannot possibly reach its own simulated final
halt state no matter what HHH does.
We cannot move on to the next step that depends
on this step.
-- Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
Haut de la page
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.
NewsPortal