Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---

Liste des GroupesRevenir à theory 
Sujet : Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---
De : 643-408-1753 (at) *nospam* kylheku.com (Kaz Kylheku)
Groupes : comp.theory
Date : 30. Oct 2025, 00:30:02
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <20251029161840.401@kylheku.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
User-Agent : slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux)
On 2025-10-29, olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:
On 10/29/2025 2:08 PM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
On 2025-10-29, olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:
On 10/29/2025 5:07 AM, Mikko wrote:
Note that the above still keeps the option to deceive with equivocation.
>
>
Not at all, it is stipulated that H does simulate
D according to the semantics of the C language until
H sees that itself is stuck in recursive simulation.
 
Then H reports 0, whereas if the simulation is continued,
it hals in th esmae way as a D() executed on a regular
simulartor/processor.
>
I don't see how you are getting this.

Which line of code are you struggling with? I'm open to questions.

It seems to me that you are saying that
when you kill a turkey and entirely consume
all of its flesh that some how the turkey
is still running around in your back yard.

Are you simply not able to wrap your imagination around the point that when
your HHH bails out of its loop inside Decide_Halting_HH and returns 0, the
slave_state and slave_stack objects still exist, representing the suspended
simulation of D (DD, DDD< ...) exactly as HHH left it, ready for taking the
next DebugStep call?
>
void Infinite_Loop()
{
   HERE: goto HERE;
   return;
}
>
We can "prove" that the above code halts
by simply cheating and saying that it means
to go directly to its return statement.

No, we cannot prove that the above halts, because it doesn't
terminate.

You can try it. Clone my repo, build x86utm_exe with the reckoning
module in it.

  git clone https://www.kylheku.com/git/x86utmI 

Then modify Halt7.c such that HHH(Infinite_Loop) is called in main
and build Halt7.o.

When you run

  ./x86utm_exe Halt7.obj

you will see that there will be a report that an abandoned simulation
of _Infinite_Loop exists. Then when that is restarted, it will get
stuck.

In the reckoning.cpp file you can go into simulation::do_reckoning
and add a trace like this:

    int x = 45; // ADD THIS

    while (!done) {
      emu->max_instr++;
      u32 status = DebugStep(emu, flags, utm, rd,
                             iter->master_state, iter->slave_state, iter->decoded);
      u32 EIP = get32(emu, iter->slave_state, reg(EIP));

      if (x > 0) { // ADD THIS if statement
        x--;
        iter->print("\n");
      }

It will print info about the first 45 instructions of the reanimated
simulation. The EIP should confirm that it's gotten into the
infinite loop inside Infinite_Loop.

--
TXR Programming Language: http://nongnu.org/txr
Cygnal: Cygwin Native Application Library: http://kylheku.com/cygnal
Mastodon: @Kazinator@mstdn.ca

Date Sujet#  Auteur
23 Oct 25 * hey polcott, you hear about AI psychosis???77dart200
23 Oct 25 `* Re: hey polcott, you hear about AI psychosis???76olcott
23 Oct 25  `* Re: hey polcott, you hear about AI psychosis???75Kaz Kylheku
24 Oct 25   `* "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---74olcott
24 Oct 25    +* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---65dbush
24 Oct 25    i`* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---64olcott
24 Oct 25    i +* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---58dbush
24 Oct 25    i i`* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---57olcott
24 Oct 25    i i `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---56dbush
24 Oct 25    i i  `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---55olcott
24 Oct 25    i i   +* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---5dbush
24 Oct 25    i i   i`* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---4olcott
24 Oct 25    i i   i `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---3dbush
24 Oct 25    i i   i  `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---2olcott
24 Oct 25    i i   i   `- Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---1dbush
26 Oct 25    i i   `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---49Mikko Levanto
26 Oct 25    i i    `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---48Tristan Wibberley
27 Oct 25    i i     `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---47Mikko
27 Oct 25    i i      `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---46olcott
27 Oct 25    i i       +* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---3Alan Mackenzie
27 Oct 25    i i       i`* HHH(DD) is very obviously correct to reject its input2olcott
27 Oct 25    i i       i `- Re: HHH(DD) is very obviously correct to reject its input1Chris M. Thomasson
28 Oct 25    i i       `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---42Mikko
28 Oct 25    i i        `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---41olcott
29 Oct 25    i i         `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---40Mikko
29 Oct 25    i i          `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---39olcott
29 Oct 25    i i           +* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---25Kaz Kylheku
29 Oct 25    i i           i`* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---24olcott
29 Oct 25    i i           i +* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---2Chris M. Thomasson
29 Oct 25    i i           i i`- Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---1Chris M. Thomasson
30 Oct 25    i i           i +* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---20Kaz Kylheku
30 Oct 25    i i           i i`* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---19olcott
30 Oct 25    i i           i i +* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---12Kaz Kylheku
30 Oct 25    i i           i i i`* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---11olcott
30 Oct 25    i i           i i i +- Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---1dbush
30 Oct 25    i i           i i i `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---9Kaz Kylheku
30 Oct 25    i i           i i i  `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---8olcott
30 Oct 25    i i           i i i   `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---7Kaz Kylheku
30 Oct 25    i i           i i i    `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---6olcott
30 Oct 25    i i           i i i     +- Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---1dbush
30 Oct 25    i i           i i i     `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---4Kaz Kylheku
30 Oct 25    i i           i i i      `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---3olcott
30 Oct 25    i i           i i i       `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---2Kaz Kylheku
30 Oct 25    i i           i i i        `- Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---1Kaz Kylheku
30 Oct 25    i i           i i +- Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---1Chris M. Thomasson
30 Oct 25    i i           i i `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---5joes
30 Oct 25    i i           i i  `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---4olcott
30 Oct 25    i i           i i   `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---3joes
30 Oct 25    i i           i i    `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---2olcott
30 Oct 25    i i           i i     `- Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---1Kaz Kylheku
30 Oct 25    i i           i `- Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---1Chris M. Thomasson
30 Oct 25    i i           `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---13Mikko
30 Oct 25    i i            `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---12olcott
31 Oct 25    i i             `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---11Mikko
31 Oct 25    i i              `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---10olcott
1 Nov 25    i i               `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---9Mikko
1 Nov 25    i i                `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---8olcott
1 Nov 25    i i                 +* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---6Kaz Kylheku
1 Nov 25    i i                 i`* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---5olcott
1 Nov 25    i i                 i +- Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---1dbush
1 Nov 25    i i                 i `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---3Kaz Kylheku
1 Nov 25    i i                 i  `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---2olcott
2 Nov 25    i i                 i   `- Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---1Kaz Kylheku
2 Nov 25    i i                 `- Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---1Mikko
24 Oct 25    i `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---5Kaz Kylheku
24 Oct 25    i  `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---4olcott
24 Oct 25    i   `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---3Kaz Kylheku
24 Oct 25    i    `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---2olcott
24 Oct 25    i     `- Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---1Kaz Kylheku
24 Oct 25    `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---8Kaz Kylheku
24 Oct 25     `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---7olcott
24 Oct 25      `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---6Kaz Kylheku
24 Oct 25       `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---5olcott
24 Oct 25        +- Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---1dbush
24 Oct 25        `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---3Kaz Kylheku
24 Oct 25         `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---2olcott
24 Oct 25          `- Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---1Kaz Kylheku

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal