Re: Three Reviewers best ignored and some good ones

Liste des GroupesRevenir à theory 
Sujet : Re: Three Reviewers best ignored and some good ones
De : wyniijj5 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (wij)
Groupes : comp.theory
Date : 30. Oct 2025, 15:39:15
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <31170800d9445200054cfa221fe33ae9d3c98a32.camel@gmail.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
User-Agent : Evolution 3.56.2 (3.56.2-2.fc42)
On Wed, 2025-10-29 at 22:01 -0500, olcott wrote:
On 10/29/2025 9:49 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 10/29/25 6:46 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 10/29/25 4:46 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 10/29/25 1:42 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 10/29/2025 12:42 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 10/29/25 12:42 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 10/28/2025 9:48 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 10/28/25 6:53 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
 
HOW THE FUCK DOES IT WRITE A SYMBOL OR MOVE THE TAPE AROUND?
IDK FUCKING JUST HAPPENS...
 
Because that *IS* what it is defined to do.
 
 
wow you gishgallop special pleading dumbass motherfucker just
fucking wow...
 
rofl.
 
 
so the turing machine can just work because *its* defined to be
so, no need to explain how,
 
but i need explain "how" RTMs beyond a definition because why????
 
 
Because you wanted more attention than the "moronic" Olcott?
 
actually kill yourself
 
 
You first? Deal. Lair paradox?
 
literally buy a gun, load it, cock the hammer, switch off the safety,
point it at ur head, and pull the trigger u literal piece of
existential trash
 
 
All you are doing is just admitting that you know you logic is broken,
so you need to move to nonsense.
 
bro fuck u for encouraging an absolute troll like chris.
 
fucking boomers never learned to communicate properly so ofc u fucking
all failed to use the internet to converge on anything meaningful.
 
 
*There are at least three complete Trolls here --- best ignored*
Chris M. Thomasson // 99% pure nonsense
dbush and          // 99% pure dogma with zero comprehension
Richard Damon      // 100% stuck in rebuttal mode and mean

At the beginning, R.D. (and others) tireless explained the HP and the bugs of
POOH. But you kept 'in rebuttal mode' to fabricate false report in response..
All is left to quit responding to you or ... like R.D. did. I like what he did
for me, so I don't have to. You are a true IDIOT and LIAR.

Note: This is not defamation, your reputation IS so, what is FACT.

 
*These are good reviewers*
Alan Mackenzie
André G. Isaak
Mikko
Ben Bacarisse
Mike Terry
 
Kaz might give you a fair review too
he is reasonable at least 1/3 of the time.


Date Sujet#  Auteur
24 Oct 25 * I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS138dart200
24 Oct 25 `* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS137Jeff Barnett
24 Oct 25  `* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS136Jeff Barnett
24 Oct 25   `* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS135dart200
25 Oct 25    +* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS4Tristan Wibberley
25 Oct 25    i`* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS3dart200
25 Oct 25    i `* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS2Tristan Wibberley
25 Oct 25    i  `- Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS1dart200
25 Oct 25    +- Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS1Tristan Wibberley
25 Oct 25    `* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS129dart200
26 Oct 25     `* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS128dart200
27 Oct 25      `* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS127dart200
28 Oct 25       +- Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS1Chris M. Thomasson
28 Oct 25       `* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS125dart200
29 Oct 25        `* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS124dart200
29 Oct 25         +* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS101Chris M. Thomasson
29 Oct 25         i`* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS100dart200
29 Oct 25         i `* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS99Chris M. Thomasson
29 Oct 25         i  `* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS98Chris M. Thomasson
29 Oct 25         i   `* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS97dart200
29 Oct 25         i    `* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS96Chris M. Thomasson
29 Oct 25         i     `* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS95dart200
29 Oct 25         i      +* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS4olcott
29 Oct 25         i      i`* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS3dart200
29 Oct 25         i      i `* Good and Bad Reviewers on comp.theory2olcott
29 Oct 25         i      i  `- Re: Good and Bad Reviewers on comp.theory1Chris M. Thomasson
29 Oct 25         i      +* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS81dart200
29 Oct 25         i      i+* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS72dart200
29 Oct 25         i      ii+* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS9Chris M. Thomasson
29 Oct 25         i      iii`* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS8dart200
29 Oct 25         i      iii `* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS7Chris M. Thomasson
29 Oct 25         i      iii  `* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS6dart200
29 Oct 25         i      iii   `* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS5Chris M. Thomasson
29 Oct 25         i      iii    `* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS4dart200
29 Oct 25         i      iii     `* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS3Chris M. Thomasson
29 Oct 25         i      iii      `* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS2dart200
29 Oct 25         i      iii       `- Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS1Chris M. Thomasson
30 Oct 25         i      ii`* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS62dart200
30 Oct 25         i      ii +* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS --- gist understood44olcott
30 Oct 25         i      ii i`* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS --- gist understood43dart200
30 Oct 25         i      ii i +* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS --- gist understood2olcott
30 Oct 25         i      ii i i`- Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS --- gist understood1Kaz Kylheku
31 Oct 25         i      ii i +* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS --- gist understood33dart200
1 Nov 25         i      ii i i`* wow richard is /still/ a retard32dart200
1 Nov 25         i      ii i i +* Re: wow richard is /still/ a retard16dart200
1 Nov 25         i      ii i i i`* philosophy matters in practice15dart200
1 Nov 25         i      ii i i i `* richard the lying retard14dart200
2 Nov 25         i      ii i i i  +* Re: richard the lying chatbot4dart200
2 Nov 25         i      ii i i i  i+- Re: richard the lying chatbot1olcott
3 Nov 25         i      ii i i i  i`* Re: richard the lying chatbot2dart200
3 Nov 25         i      ii i i i  i `- Re: richard the lying chatbot1dart200
2 Nov 25         i      ii i i i  `* Re: richard the lying retard9Tristan Wibberley
2 Nov 25         i      ii i i i   +* Re: richard the lying retard3olcott
2 Nov 25         i      ii i i i   i`* Re: richard the lying retard2Kaz Kylheku
3 Nov 25         i      ii i i i   i `- Re: richard the lying retard1dart200
3 Nov 25         i      ii i i i   +* Re: richard the lying retard4dart200
3 Nov 25         i      ii i i i   i`* Re: richard the lying retard3Tristan Wibberley
3 Nov 25         i      ii i i i   i +- Re: richard the lying retard1olcott
3 Nov 25         i      ii i i i   i `- Re: richard the lying retard1dart200
3 Nov 25         i      ii i i i   `- Re: richard the lying retard1dart200
1 Nov 25         i      ii i i `* Re: wow richard is /still/ a retard15Kaz Kylheku
1 Nov 25         i      ii i i  `* literal nonsene14dart200
1 Nov 25         i      ii i i   `* Re: literal nonsene13Kaz Kylheku
1 Nov 25         i      ii i i    `* Re: literal nonsene12dart200
1 Nov 25         i      ii i i     `* Re: literal nonsene11Kaz Kylheku
3 Nov 25         i      ii i i      `* Re: literal nonsene10dart200
3 Nov 25         i      ii i i       +- Re: literal nonsene1Chris M. Thomasson
3 Nov 25         i      ii i i       +* Re: literal nonsene3Kaz Kylheku
3 Nov 25         i      ii i i       i`* Re: literal nonsene2dart200
3 Nov 25         i      ii i i       i `- Re: literal nonsene1Tristan Wibberley
3 Nov 25         i      ii i i       `* Re: literal nonsene5Tristan Wibberley
3 Nov 25         i      ii i i        `* Re: literal nonsene4dart200
3 Nov 25         i      ii i i         +- Re: literal nonsene1Tristan Wibberley
3 Nov 25         i      ii i i         `* Re: literal nonsene2Tristan Wibberley
3 Nov 25         i      ii i i          `- Re: literal nonsene1dart200
1 Nov 25         i      ii i `* wow richard is a retard7dart200
1 Nov 25         i      ii i  +* Re: wow richard is a retard --- Maybe his ADD is much worse than I thought5olcott
1 Nov 25         i      ii i  i`* if only polcott ...4dart200
1 Nov 25         i      ii i  i `* Re: if only polcott ...3olcott
1 Nov 25         i      ii i  i  `* Re: if only polcott ...2dart200
1 Nov 25         i      ii i  i   `- Re: if only polcott ...1olcott
1 Nov 25         i      ii i  `- Re: wow richard is a retard1dart200
30 Oct 25         i      ii `* wow richard is a retard17dart200
30 Oct 25         i      ii  +* Re: wow richard is a retard8Kaz Kylheku
30 Oct 25         i      ii  i+* Re: wow richard is a retard5olcott
30 Oct 25         i      ii  ii`* Re: wow richard is a retard4Kaz Kylheku
30 Oct 25         i      ii  ii `* Re: wow richard is a retard3olcott
30 Oct 25         i      ii  ii  `* Re: wow richard is a retard2Kaz Kylheku
30 Oct 25         i      ii  ii   `- Re: wow richard is a retard1olcott
30 Oct 25         i      ii  i+- A self-reflecting UTM1olcott
30 Oct 25         i      ii  i`- Re: wow richard is a retard1dart200
31 Oct 25         i      ii  `* Re: wow fuck retarded richard8dart200
31 Oct 25         i      ii   +* Re: wow fuck retarded richard2Kaz Kylheku
31 Oct 25         i      ii   i`- Re: wow fuck retarded richard1dart200
31 Oct 25         i      ii   +* Re: wow fuck retarded richard3Chris M. Thomasson
1 Nov 25         i      ii   i`* sorry polcott2dart200
1 Nov 25         i      ii   i `- Re: sorry polcott1olcott
1 Nov 25         i      ii   `* wow turing dunks on retarded richard2dart200
1 Nov 25         i      ii    `- Re: wow turing dunks on retarded richard1dart200
29 Oct 25         i      i`* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS8Chris M. Thomasson
29 Oct 25         i      i `* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS7dart200
29 Oct 25         i      `* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS9Chris M. Thomasson
29 Oct 25         `* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS22dart200

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal