Re: tin: article stubs one line short

Urs Janssen <urs@buil.tin.org> wrote:

Anton Shepelev wrote:

Yes.  When when I invoke a postponed article by ^O, tin invokes:
    vi +0 /home/ant/.tin_dir/.article.2109

>
oic, I forgot that we didn't bother to check where the body starts
for postponed articles. quick fix: adjust the last arg. of post_loop()
in post.c:post_postponed_article() from 0 to 1.
>
I'll calculate to correct offset to the fist line in the body for
the next release.

Thank you, Urs.
Instead of rebuilding Tin,
I can write a shamefully dumb wrapper around vi
that replaces +0 with +6...