Liste des Groupes | Revenir à math |
On 08.10.2024 15:24, joes wrote:Where?Am Tue, 08 Oct 2024 12:51:03 +0200 schrieb WM:But after the visble natural numbers the dark domain comes, and that is what prevents to see the end (which is dark too).On 07.10.2024 17:18, joes wrote:Only according to your broken concept of cardinality, by which N u {a}Am Mon, 07 Oct 2024 11:08:33 +0200 schrieb WM:Nonsense.On 07.10.2024 10:05, joes wrote:„More” being a different kind of infinity, namely at least uncountable.Am Mon, 07 Oct 2024 09:41:23 +0200 schrieb WM:It keeps all its elements but not more.On 06.10.2024 17:48, Alan Mackenzie wrote:Nor does it get shorter, it stays infinite.
even an unbounded sequence does not get longer when shifted by one
step.
is „bigger” than N, and N\{1} u {a} can’t even be compared.
>I believe it is called the order type.All ω+k are equally infinite.Nonsense.
>>Bijection is not about completeness, countability is.Isn’t N\{1} finite? It has ω-1 elements.Cardinality is nonsense.It can, if I begin numbering with 2. The cardinality of N\{1} can’t beOf course stopping after a finite number, which potential infinityName them by all the natural numbers. Then no further guest can
seems to mean, is not „complete” in that sense. Hilbert’s Hotel is
actually infinite, it already holds infinite guests.
appear.
finite.
How did it "lose" it, I thought you claim was that it was unchangable?The last natural index has lost its 9 by shifting to the left-hand side. Hence there is nothing remaining.That shows my point. Infinite sets can be moved. 0.999...999 moved givesYou have not indicated what this notation means. Where does the zero come
9.99...9990.
from?
>What example do you have in mind?Another point is this: [0, 1) moved gives (0, 1].Can you generalise this?>Regards, WM
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.