Sujet : Re: Replacement of Cardinality
De : ross.a.finlayson (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Ross Finlayson)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 18. Aug 2024, 22:15:56
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <JKWdnY6Z7aUX-V_7nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
On 08/18/2024 11:52 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 8/18/2024 1:16 AM, joes wrote:
Am Sat, 17 Aug 2024 13:39:52 +0000 schrieb WM:
Le 16/08/2024 à 20:11, joes a écrit :
Am Fri, 16 Aug 2024 17:00:26 +0000 schrieb WM:
Le 16/08/2024 à 18:50, joes a écrit :
Am Fri, 16 Aug 2024 16:19:17 +0000 schrieb WM:
>
Taking steps only until the next unit fraction, you never reach 0.
Start from x = 0. The increase cannot be more than 1.
No, you were counting down from 1.
There we see that counting down to 0 requires dark numbers.
Counting down from infinity is not possible. Your "dark" numbers
are a nonstandard extension.
>
>
Yup. Counting down from infinity is moronic. No wonder why WM assumes
there is a place to start counting from, aka finite...
Hey, it was Cantor's idea first, ....
…