Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers

Liste des GroupesRevenir à math 
Sujet : Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
De : FTR (at) *nospam* nomail.afraid.org (FromTheRafters)
Groupes : sci.math
Date : 20. Nov 2024, 15:15:59
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Peripheral Visions
Message-ID : <vhkqv3$4jv7$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
User-Agent : MesNews/1.08.06.00-gb
WM explained on 11/20/2024 :
On 19.11.2024 17:42, FromTheRafters wrote:
WM submitted this idea :
>
 > There is a bijection.
>
Only between numbers which have more successors than predecessors, although it is claimed that no successors are remaining.
 You are not making any sense.
>
It is set theory which is not making sense.
Try to count to a natural number that has fewer successors than predecessors. Impossible. But set theory claims that all natural numbers can be counted to such that no successors remain.
No it doesn't.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
3 Nov 24 * Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers505Jim Burns
4 Nov 24 `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers504WM
4 Nov 24  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers503Jim Burns
4 Nov 24   +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers481WM
5 Nov 24   i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers480Jim Burns
5 Nov 24   i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers4Jim Burns
5 Nov 24   i i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (re-Vitali-ized)3Ross Finlayson
5 Nov 24   i i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (re-Vitali-ized)2Ross Finlayson
5 Nov 24   i i  `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (re-Vitali-ized)1Chris M. Thomasson
6 Nov 24   i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers470WM
6 Nov 24   i i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers469Jim Burns
6 Nov 24   i i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers466WM
6 Nov 24   i i i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers465Jim Burns
6 Nov 24   i i i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers464WM
6 Nov 24   i i i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers463Jim Burns
7 Nov 24   i i i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers462WM
7 Nov 24   i i i    +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers7Jim Burns
7 Nov 24   i i i    i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers6WM
7 Nov 24   i i i    i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers5Jim Burns
7 Nov 24   i i i    i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers4WM
7 Nov 24   i i i    i   +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers2Jim Burns
7 Nov 24   i i i    i   i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers1WM
7 Nov 24   i i i    i   `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers1Chris M. Thomasson
7 Nov 24   i i i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers454Jim Burns
7 Nov 24   i i i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers453WM
8 Nov 24   i i i      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers452Jim Burns
8 Nov 24   i i i       `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers451WM
8 Nov 24   i i i        +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers18Richard Damon
8 Nov 24   i i i        i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers17WM
8 Nov 24   i i i        i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers2Richard Damon
9 Nov 24   i i i        i i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers1WM
8 Nov 24   i i i        i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers14joes
8 Nov 24   i i i        i  +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers7Moebius
8 Nov 24   i i i        i  i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers6Moebius
9 Nov 24   i i i        i  i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers5WM
9 Nov 24   i i i        i  i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers4Chris M. Thomasson
9 Nov 24   i i i        i  i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers3Moebius
10 Nov 24   i i i        i  i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers2WM
10 Nov 24   i i i        i  i     `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers1Chris M. Thomasson
9 Nov 24   i i i        i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers6WM
26 Dec 24   i i i        i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers5Chris M. Thomasson
26 Dec 24   i i i        i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers4Moebius
27 Dec 24   i i i        i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers3Chris M. Thomasson
27 Dec 24   i i i        i      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers2Moebius
28 Dec 24   i i i        i       `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers1Chris M. Thomasson
8 Nov 24   i i i        +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (doubling-spaces)2Ross Finlayson
8 Nov 24   i i i        i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (doubling-spaces)1Ross Finlayson
8 Nov 24   i i i        `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers430Jim Burns
9 Nov 24   i i i         `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers429WM
10 Nov 24   i i i          `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers428Jim Burns
10 Nov 24   i i i           `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers427WM
10 Nov 24   i i i            +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (exponential)1Ross Finlayson
10 Nov 24   i i i            +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers389Jim Burns
11 Nov 24   i i i            i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers388WM
11 Nov 24   i i i            i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers387Jim Burns
11 Nov 24   i i i            i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers386WM
11 Nov 24   i i i            i   +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers5FromTheRafters
12 Nov 24   i i i            i   i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers4WM
12 Nov 24   i i i            i   i +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers1FromTheRafters
12 Nov 24   i i i            i   i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers2joes
12 Nov 24   i i i            i   i  `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers1WM
12 Nov 24   i i i            i   +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers2Jim Burns
12 Nov 24   i i i            i   i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers1WM
12 Nov 24   i i i            i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers378Jim Burns
12 Nov 24   i i i            i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers377WM
12 Nov 24   i i i            i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers376Jim Burns
12 Nov 24   i i i            i      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers375WM
13 Nov 24   i i i            i       +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers2Jim Burns
13 Nov 24   i i i            i       i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers1WM
13 Nov 24   i i i            i       `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers372Jim Burns
13 Nov 24   i i i            i        `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers371WM
13 Nov 24   i i i            i         `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers370Jim Burns
13 Nov 24   i i i            i          `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers369WM
14 Nov 24   i i i            i           `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers368Jim Burns
14 Nov 24   i i i            i            +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers6FromTheRafters
14 Nov 24   i i i            i            i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers5Jim Burns
14 Nov 24   i i i            i            i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers3Ross Finlayson
15 Nov 24   i i i            i            i i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (research)2Ross Finlayson
15 Nov 24   i i i            i            i i `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (research)1Ross Finlayson
14 Nov 24   i i i            i            i `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers1FromTheRafters
14 Nov 24   i i i            i            `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers361WM
14 Nov 24   i i i            i             +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers291Jim Burns
15 Nov 24   i i i            i             i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers290WM
15 Nov 24   i i i            i             i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers2joes
15 Nov 24   i i i            i             i i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers1WM
15 Nov 24   i i i            i             i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers287Jim Burns
15 Nov 24   i i i            i             i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers286WM
15 Nov 24   i i i            i             i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers285Chris M. Thomasson
16 Nov 24   i i i            i             i    +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers1Moebius
16 Nov 24   i i i            i             i    +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers280Moebius
16 Nov 24   i i i            i             i    i+- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers1Moebius
16 Nov 24   i i i            i             i    i+* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers2Moebius
16 Nov 24   i i i            i             i    ii`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers1WM
16 Nov 24   i i i            i             i    i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers276Chris M. Thomasson
16 Nov 24   i i i            i             i    i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers275Chris M. Thomasson
16 Nov 24   i i i            i             i    i  +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers2Chris M. Thomasson
16 Nov 24   i i i            i             i    i  i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers1Moebius
16 Nov 24   i i i            i             i    i  +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers13FromTheRafters
16 Nov 24   i i i            i             i    i  i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers12Chris M. Thomasson
16 Nov 24   i i i            i             i    i  i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers2Moebius
16 Nov 24   i i i            i             i    i  i i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers1Moebius
16 Nov 24   i i i            i             i    i  i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers7Moebius
17 Nov 24   i i i            i             i    i  i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers2FromTheRafters
16 Nov 24   i i i            i             i    i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers259Moebius
16 Nov 24   i i i            i             i    +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers1Moebius
16 Nov 24   i i i            i             i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers2Moebius
14 Nov 24   i i i            i             `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers69Jim Burns
10 Nov 24   i i i            `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers36Chris M. Thomasson
6 Nov 24   i i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (opinions)2Ross Finlayson
6 Nov 24   i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers5WM
4 Nov 24   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers21Chris M. Thomasson

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal