Sujet : Re: Replacement of Cardinality
De : wolfgang.mueckenheim (at) *nospam* tha.de (WM)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 19. Aug 2024, 12:59:52
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <TFjrAYWK3mweSel4JAEPElgej-U@jntp>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Nemo/0.999a
Le 19/08/2024 à 13:34, Richard Damon a écrit :
On 8/19/24 7:29 AM, WM wrote:
That is not an assumption but it is derived from the mathematics:
∀n ∈ ℕ: 1/n - 1/(n+1) > 0
But that doesn't say there is a smallest unit fraction,
This formula says that never more than one unit fraction appears at a point x. Since not many can appear together, there must be a first one.
Regards, WM
Re: Replacement of Cardinality
Re: Replacement of Cardinality