Sujet : Re: Replacement of Cardinality
De : chris.m.thomasson.1 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Chris M. Thomasson)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 19. Aug 2024, 21:09:35
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <va08pv$30ha0$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 8/19/2024 4:59 AM, WM wrote:
Le 19/08/2024 à 13:34, Richard Damon a écrit :
On 8/19/24 7:29 AM, WM wrote:
That is not an assumption but it is derived from the mathematics:
∀n ∈ ℕ: 1/n - 1/(n+1) > 0
But that doesn't say there is a smallest unit fraction,
This formula says that never more than one unit fraction appears at a point x. Since not many can appear together, there must be a first one.
Oh blow it out your hind end all over your students. That was a goof, but it sure seems like you are doing that...
Re: Replacement of Cardinality
Re: Replacement of Cardinality