Sujet : Re: Replacement of Cardinality
De : invalid (at) *nospam* example.invalid (Moebius)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 25. Aug 2024, 23:20:10
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vagamr$23e8p$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Am 25.08.2024 um 23:57 schrieb Jim Burns:
On 8/25/2024 3:41 PM, WM wrote:
For a distance to exist in every case
mathematics is sufficicient:
∀n ∈ ℕ: 1/n - 1/(n+1) > 0 .
For each n ∈ ℕ:
1/(n+1) is a counter.example disproving the claim
that 1/n is the smallest unit.fraction:
1/n - 1/(n+1) > 0
In dsm I just told him (Mückenheim):
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Unlike you, however, some people understand that your formula IMPLIES that there is no smallest unit fraction. 🙂
Proof: From ∀n ∈ ℕ: 1/n - 1/(n+1) > 0 it follows: ∀n ∈ ℕ: 1/n > 1/(n+1). Because Ax(x e SB <-> En e IN: x = 1/n) it follows (easily): As e SB: Es' e SB: s' < s. qed
For every unit fraction there is a smaller one (hence there can't be a smallest unit fraction).
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~