Re: How compile a DSL, does it need Types? (Re: Side Note, Why not DSLs?)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à math 
Sujet : Re: How compile a DSL, does it need Types? (Re: Side Note, Why not DSLs?)
De : chris.m.thomasson.1 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Chris M. Thomasson)
Groupes : sci.math
Date : 03. Jan 2025, 23:03:27
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vl9mrg$3796$6@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 1/3/2025 1:52 PM, Mild Shock wrote:
Hi,
 Well you don't need always types. JavaScript
has also no types. And there is a trend to
have gradual types. Make them kind of optional
[...]
I think JavaScript might have been inspired by hypercard.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
3 Jan 25 * Side Note, Why not DSLs? (Was: Chicken and egg, with curry?)5Mild Shock
3 Jan 25 `* Re: Side Note, Why not DSLs? (Was: Chicken and egg, with curry?)4Chris M. Thomasson
3 Jan 25  `* Re: Side Note, Why not DSLs? (Was: Chicken and egg, with curry?)3Mild Shock
3 Jan 25   `* How compile a DSL, does it need Types? (Re: Side Note, Why not DSLs?)2Mild Shock
3 Jan 25    `- Re: How compile a DSL, does it need Types? (Re: Side Note, Why not DSLs?)1Chris M. Thomasson

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal