Sujet : Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)
De : invalid (at) *nospam* example.invalid (Moebius)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 11. Jan 2025, 05:21:29
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vlsrka$f6pk$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Am 11.01.2025 um 04:51 schrieb Moebius:
Am 10.01.2025 um 23:18 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:
On 1/10/2025 1:52 AM, WM wrote:
Then for every [ordinal number] it is determined whether [it] is a natural number [or not].
Indeed!
There is even a simple criteria for this (i.e. if an ordinal number is a natural number or not):
For each and every ordinal number x:
x is a natural number iff x < omega.
.
.
.