Re: Hello!

Liste des GroupesRevenir à math 
Sujet : Re: Hello!
De : r.hachel (at) *nospam* liscati.fr.invalid (Richard Hachel)
Groupes : sci.math
Date : 20. Jan 2025, 11:42:31
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <tfNEDfYShy-2Mc9vfhd7IvmcxDQ@jntp>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Nemo/1.0
Le 19/01/2025 à 20:02, sobriquet a écrit :
 The latest desmos links should have the correct equation. If not, could you please be specific and point out which equation in the list of expressions on the left side is incorrect?.
 One striking feature of conventional products is that the product of
complex numbers on the unit circle ends up on the unit circle and your
alternative way to define multiplication doesn't have that feature:
I gave yesterday the formula for the addition of complex numbers as I gave, a long time ago already, the correct formula for the general addition of relativistic speeds.
I put it here again as an example.
Addition formula:
(a+ib)+(a'-ib')=(a+a')+i(b+b')
Multiplication formula:
(a+ib)(a'+ib')=aa'+(ib')a+(ib)a'+(ib)(ib')
Here, during the simplification, we must be careful not to make a colossal blunder. It is the product (ib)(ib') that will produce this blunder,
because the mathematician will not take care that (ib)(ib') is NOT
|i²|bb BUT |i|²bb'.
Here Hachel (it's me) then poses:
(a+ib)(a'+ib')=aa'+i(ab'+a'b)+bb'
and no longer:
(a+ib)(a'+ib')=aa'+i(ab'+a'b)-bb' which is a false result in its real part aa'+bb'.
R.H.
Date Sujet#  Auteur
18 Jan 25 * Hello!36Richard Hachel
19 Jan 25 +* Re: Hello!30sobriquet
19 Jan 25 i+* Re: Hello!25Richard Hachel
19 Jan 25 ii+* Re: Hello!16Moebius
19 Jan 25 iii+- Re: Hello!1Moebius
19 Jan 25 iii`* Re: Hello!14Richard Hachel
19 Jan 25 iii `* Re: Hello!13Moebius
19 Jan 25 iii  `* Re: Hello!12Richard Hachel
19 Jan 25 iii   +- Re: Hello!1Python
19 Jan 25 iii   +* Re: Hello!9Moebius
19 Jan 25 iii   i+* Re: Hello!7Moebius
19 Jan 25 iii   ii`* Re: Hello!6Moebius
19 Jan 25 iii   ii `* Re: Hello!5Python
20 Jan 25 iii   ii  +* Re: Hello!2Moebius
20 Jan 25 iii   ii  i`- Re: Hello!1Chris M. Thomasson
20 Jan 25 iii   ii  `* Re: Hello!2Richard Hachel
20 Jan 25 iii   ii   `- Re: Hello!1Python
20 Jan 25 iii   i`- Re: Hello!1Richard Hachel
19 Jan 25 iii   `- Re: Hello!1Moebius
19 Jan 25 ii`* Re: Hello!8sobriquet
19 Jan 25 ii `* Re: Hello!7sobriquet
19 Jan 25 ii  `* Re: Hello!6Richard Hachel
19 Jan 25 ii   +* Re: Hello!3guido wugi
19 Jan 25 ii   i+- Re: Hello!1Moebius
20 Jan 25 ii   i`- Re: Hello!1Richard Hachel
19 Jan 25 ii   `* Re: Hello!2sobriquet
20 Jan 25 ii    `- Re: Hello!1Richard Hachel
19 Jan 25 i+- Re: Hello!1Ross Finlayson
19 Jan 25 i`* Re: Hello!3Richard Hachel
20 Jan 25 i `* Re: Hello!2Jim Burns
20 Jan 25 i  `- Re: Hello!1Richard Hachel
30 Jan 25 `* What is i ? was: Hello!5Jim Burns
30 Jan 25  +- Re: What is i ? was: Hello!1Richard Hachel
31 Jan 25  `* Re: What is i ? was: Hello!3guido wugi
31 Jan 25   `* Re: What is i ? was: Hello!2Jim Burns
31 Jan 25    `- Re: What is i ? was: Hello!1guido wugi

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal