Re: The set of necessary FISONs

Am Wed, 29 Jan 2025 11:04:03 +0100 schrieb WM:

On 29.01.2025 10:38, FromTheRafters wrote:
 

Omega has no immediate predecessor.

What is immediately before ω?

This is literally senseless. You are mistaken in even assuming
there is a „there”. There is no such place. ω has no predecessor.
There is nothing whose successor is ω.

And how long is the distance from ω to a natnumber?

ω, if you cared to define it as that number k such that n + k = ω.

--
Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:
It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.