Re: The set of necessary FISONs

On 2/23/25 5:42 AM, WM wrote:

On 23.02.2025 04:38, Richard Damon wrote:

On 2/22/25 1:02 PM, WM wrote:

 

If every FISON can be omitted, then nothing remains for a sufficient set. Because if there was any sufficient set, it would have a first FISON.

 

The fact that none of them are individually requred doesn't mean you can't use them.

 They are used to confuse cranks.

So, you admit that you goal is to cause confusion?
Or is it just deceit?

>
I guess you do think that we can't factor 36, since none of the factors are requires, so all can be omitted from the set you can use.

 You don't even understand that simple example? Poor boy.

An example based on error?
Stupid boy WM.

 Regards, WM