Re: Equation complexe

Liste des GroupesRevenir à math 
Sujet : Re: Equation complexe
De : r.hachel (at) *nospam* tiscali.fr (Richard Hachel)
Groupes : sci.math
Date : 25. Feb 2025, 23:15:08
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <xtbgen-5bfiLtux6_UxTn0Yjubs@jntp>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Nemo/1.0
Le 25/02/2025 à 23:05, guido wugi a écrit :
Op 25/02/2025 om 21:07 schreef Richard Hachel:
Le 25/02/2025 à 18:21, Jim Burns a écrit :
On 2/25/2025 9:23 AM, Richard Hachel wrote:
>
x^4=-81
>
What is x?
>
x ∈ {(+1+𝑖)⋅3/√2, (+1-𝑖)⋅3/√2, (-1+𝑖)⋅3/√2, (-1-𝑖)⋅3/√2}
>
Oui, c'est ce que dis aussi l'Intelligence artificielle, mais sans trop expliquer pourquoi.
Personally, I propose only one root, but it is not in conformity with what is said about "complex numbers".
I remind you that I do not admit the definition i²=-1, which, in itself, is not false, but so narrow that I do not understand its semantic interest.
For me, the definition must be extended to all powers of x such that i^x=-1.
 Contradictory, thus impossible.
If i^2=-1 then (i^2)^2 = (-1)^2 = 1 =  i^4
Absolutely not...
Pfffff...
You are using real powers on imaginary numbers.
You don't seem to understand what I'm saying.
I am stating the precise, formal, and definitive definition that in this imaginary system, the fundamental law is i^x=-1.
A fundamental law is not negotiable.
Now, you start to negotiate, like Python, and to tell me while crying: i^4=1.
This is not serious behavior.
R.H.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
25 Feb 25 * Equation complexe101Richard Hachel
25 Feb 25 +* Re: Equation complexe73Jim Burns
25 Feb 25 i`* Re: Equation complexe72Richard Hachel
25 Feb 25 i +* Re: Equation complexe3Python
25 Feb 25 i i`* Re: Equation complexe2Richard Hachel
25 Feb 25 i i `- Re: Equation complexe1Python
25 Feb 25 i +* Re: Equation complexe5guido wugi
25 Feb 25 i i`* Re: Equation complexe4Richard Hachel
25 Feb 25 i i +* Re: Equation complexe2Python
25 Feb 25 i i i`- Re: Equation complexe1Python
26 Feb 25 i i `- Re: Equation complexe1Jim Burns
26 Feb 25 i +* Re: Equation complexe21sobriquet
26 Feb 25 i i`* Re: Equation complexe20sobriquet
26 Feb 25 i i +* Re: Equation complexe16Moebius
26 Feb 25 i i i+* Re: Equation complexe12Richard Hachel
26 Feb 25 i i ii`* Re: Equation complexe11Python
26 Feb 25 i i ii +* Re: Equation complexe2Moebius
26 Feb 25 i i ii i`- Re: Equation complexe1Python
26 Feb 25 i i ii `* Re: Equation complexe8Richard Hachel
26 Feb 25 i i ii  +- Re: Equation complexe1Python
26 Feb 25 i i ii  `* Re: Equation complexe6Python
26 Feb 25 i i ii   `* Re: Equation complexe5Richard Hachel
26 Feb 25 i i ii    `* Re: Equation complexe4Python
26 Feb 25 i i ii     `* Re: Equation complexe3Python
26 Feb 25 i i ii      `* Re: Equation complexe2Richard Hachel
26 Feb 25 i i ii       `- Re: Equation complexe1Python
27 Feb 25 i i i`* Re: Equation complexe3Moebius
27 Feb 25 i i i `* Re: Equation complexe2Richard Hachel
27 Feb 25 i i i  `- Re: Equation complexe1sobriquet
26 Feb 25 i i `* Re: Equation complexe3Richard Hachel
26 Feb 25 i i  `* Re: Equation complexe2sobriquet
26 Feb 25 i i   `- Re: Equation complexe1Richard Hachel
26 Feb 25 i `* Re: Equation complexe42Jim Burns
26 Feb 25 i  `* Re: Equation complexe41Richard Hachel
26 Feb 25 i   +* Re: Equation complexe39Python
26 Feb 25 i   i`* Re: Equation complexe38Richard Hachel
26 Feb 25 i   i `* Re: Equation complexe37Python
26 Feb 25 i   i  `* Re: Equation complexe36Richard Hachel
26 Feb 25 i   i   +* Re: Equation complexe5Python
26 Feb 25 i   i   i+- Re: Equation complexe1Richard Hachel
27 Feb 25 i   i   i`* Re: Equation complexe3Moebius
27 Feb 25 i   i   i `* Re: Equation complexe2Richard Hachel
28 Feb 25 i   i   i  `- Re: Equation complexe1Chris M. Thomasson
26 Feb 25 i   i   `* Re: Equation complexe30efji
26 Feb 25 i   i    `* Re: Equation complexe29Richard Hachel
26 Feb 25 i   i     +* Re: Equation complexe2Python
27 Feb 25 i   i     i`- Re: Equation complexe1Moebius
27 Feb 25 i   i     `* Re: Equation complexe26joes
27 Feb 25 i   i      `* Re: Equation complexe25Richard Hachel
27 Feb 25 i   i       +- Re: Equation complexe1Python
27 Feb 25 i   i       +* Re: Equation complexe4Jim Burns
27 Feb 25 i   i       i`* Re: Equation complexe3Jim Burns
27 Feb 25 i   i       i `* Re: Equation complexe2Richard Hachel
28 Feb 25 i   i       i  `- Re: Equation complexe1Chris M. Thomasson
28 Feb 25 i   i       `* Re: Equation complexe19Chris M. Thomasson
28 Feb 25 i   i        +* Re: Equation complexe17Richard Hachel
28 Feb 25 i   i        i`* Re: Equation complexe16sobriquet
28 Feb 25 i   i        i `* Re: Equation complexe15Richard Hachel
28 Feb 25 i   i        i  `* Re: Equation complexe14sobriquet
28 Feb 25 i   i        i   `* Re: Equation complexe13Richard Hachel
28 Feb 25 i   i        i    `* Re: Equation complexe12sobriquet
28 Feb 25 i   i        i     +* Re: Equation complexe8Richard Hachel
28 Feb 25 i   i        i     i`* Re: Equation complexe7efji
28 Feb 25 i   i        i     i +* Re: Equation complexe2Richard Hachel
28 Feb 25 i   i        i     i i`- Re: Equation complexe1Jim Burns
28 Feb 25 i   i        i     i +* Re: Equation complexe3Moebius
28 Feb 25 i   i        i     i i`* Re: Equation complexe2Richard Hachel
28 Feb 25 i   i        i     i i `- Re: Equation complexe1Chris M. Thomasson
28 Feb 25 i   i        i     i `- Re: Equation complexe1Richard Hachel
28 Feb 25 i   i        i     `* Re: Equation complexe3Moebius
28 Feb 25 i   i        i      `* Re: Equation complexe2Chris M. Thomasson
28 Feb 25 i   i        i       `- Re: Equation complexe1Chris M. Thomasson
28 Feb 25 i   i        `- Re: Equation complexe1Chris M. Thomasson
27 Feb 25 i   `- Re: Equation complexe1Jim Burns
25 Feb 25 +- Re: Equation complexe1Chris M. Thomasson
25 Feb 25 +* Re: Equation complexe5Chris M. Thomasson
25 Feb 25 i+- Re: Equation complexe1Chris M. Thomasson
25 Feb 25 i`* Re: Equation complexe3Richard Hachel
26 Feb 25 i +- Re: Equation complexe1Chris M. Thomasson
26 Feb 25 i `- Re: Equation complexe1Chris M. Thomasson
25 Feb 25 +* Re: Equation complexe19Chris M. Thomasson
25 Feb 25 i`* Re: Equation complexe18Richard Hachel
25 Feb 25 i +* Re: Equation complexe2Chris M. Thomasson
26 Feb 25 i i`- Re: Equation complexe1Chris M. Thomasson
26 Feb 25 i `* Re: Equation complexe15Chris M. Thomasson
26 Feb 25 i  `* Re: Equation complexe14Richard Hachel
26 Feb 25 i   +* Re: Equation complexe3Chris M. Thomasson
26 Feb 25 i   i`* Re: Equation complexe2Richard Hachel
26 Feb 25 i   i `- Re: Equation complexe1Chris M. Thomasson
26 Feb 25 i   +* Re: Equation complexe3Chris M. Thomasson
26 Feb 25 i   i`* Re: Equation complexe2efji
28 Feb 25 i   i `- Re: Equation complexe1Chris M. Thomasson
26 Feb 25 i   +* Re: Equation complexe2Chris M. Thomasson
26 Feb 25 i   i`- Re: Equation complexe1Chris M. Thomasson
26 Feb 25 i   `* Re: Equation complexe5Barry Schwarz
26 Feb 25 i    +- Re: Equation complexe1Richard Hachel
26 Feb 25 i    `* Re: Equation complexe3Moebius
26 Feb 25 i     `* Re: Equation complexe2Richard Hachel
26 Feb 25 i      `- Re: Equation complexe1Python
25 Feb 25 +- Re: Equation complexe1Barry Schwarz
28 Feb 25 `- Re: Equation complexe1Chris M. Thomasson

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal