Re: Equation complexe

Liste des GroupesRevenir à math 
Sujet : Re: Equation complexe
De : chris.m.thomasson.1 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Chris M. Thomasson)
Groupes : sci.math
Date : 28. Feb 2025, 02:50:17
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vpr4op$3bu9o$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 2/27/2025 3:53 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 2/27/2025 7:42 AM, Richard Hachel wrote:
Le 27/02/2025 à 08:47, joes a écrit :
Am Wed, 26 Feb 2025 20:22:01 +0000 schrieb Richard Hachel:
Le 26/02/2025 à 21:10, efji a écrit :
>
If you assume i^2 = i*i = -1, then i^4=1.
Absolutely not.
-1*-1 is not 1?
>
Claro que si.
Pero, i*i=i²=-1 ; (i²)²=-1
It seems that the imaginary unit i is a special unit such that i^x=-1 whatever x.
>
Mathematicians are right when they say that i=-1, that i^(-1/2)=-1, that i²=-1.
But if we understand Dr. Hachel's idea, we see that these three true statements are not enough.
Hachel imposes that i is an imaginary unit such that i^x=-1 whatever x.
This confuses the mathematician, who is used to working with real numbers, and who sets a²*a²=a^4 with systematically a>0.
But here we are not working with real numbers, but with the imaginary i.
It is not the same thing: we must systematically set i^x=-1 for all x.
 It kind of seems like you deny that the y axis even exists?
A fun aspect. I think there is a way to describe 2-ary complex numbers on the real line using some special blocks, so to speak...

Date Sujet#  Auteur
25 Feb 25 * Equation complexe101Richard Hachel
25 Feb 25 +* Re: Equation complexe73Jim Burns
25 Feb 25 i`* Re: Equation complexe72Richard Hachel
25 Feb 25 i +* Re: Equation complexe3Python
25 Feb 25 i i`* Re: Equation complexe2Richard Hachel
25 Feb 25 i i `- Re: Equation complexe1Python
25 Feb 25 i +* Re: Equation complexe5guido wugi
25 Feb 25 i i`* Re: Equation complexe4Richard Hachel
25 Feb 25 i i +* Re: Equation complexe2Python
25 Feb 25 i i i`- Re: Equation complexe1Python
26 Feb 25 i i `- Re: Equation complexe1Jim Burns
26 Feb 25 i +* Re: Equation complexe21sobriquet
26 Feb 25 i i`* Re: Equation complexe20sobriquet
26 Feb 25 i i +* Re: Equation complexe16Moebius
26 Feb 25 i i i+* Re: Equation complexe12Richard Hachel
26 Feb 25 i i ii`* Re: Equation complexe11Python
26 Feb 25 i i ii +* Re: Equation complexe2Moebius
26 Feb 25 i i ii i`- Re: Equation complexe1Python
26 Feb 25 i i ii `* Re: Equation complexe8Richard Hachel
26 Feb 25 i i ii  +- Re: Equation complexe1Python
26 Feb 25 i i ii  `* Re: Equation complexe6Python
26 Feb 25 i i ii   `* Re: Equation complexe5Richard Hachel
26 Feb 25 i i ii    `* Re: Equation complexe4Python
26 Feb 25 i i ii     `* Re: Equation complexe3Python
26 Feb 25 i i ii      `* Re: Equation complexe2Richard Hachel
26 Feb 25 i i ii       `- Re: Equation complexe1Python
27 Feb 25 i i i`* Re: Equation complexe3Moebius
27 Feb 25 i i i `* Re: Equation complexe2Richard Hachel
27 Feb 25 i i i  `- Re: Equation complexe1sobriquet
26 Feb 25 i i `* Re: Equation complexe3Richard Hachel
26 Feb 25 i i  `* Re: Equation complexe2sobriquet
26 Feb 25 i i   `- Re: Equation complexe1Richard Hachel
26 Feb 25 i `* Re: Equation complexe42Jim Burns
26 Feb 25 i  `* Re: Equation complexe41Richard Hachel
26 Feb 25 i   +* Re: Equation complexe39Python
26 Feb 25 i   i`* Re: Equation complexe38Richard Hachel
26 Feb 25 i   i `* Re: Equation complexe37Python
26 Feb 25 i   i  `* Re: Equation complexe36Richard Hachel
26 Feb 25 i   i   +* Re: Equation complexe5Python
26 Feb 25 i   i   i+- Re: Equation complexe1Richard Hachel
27 Feb 25 i   i   i`* Re: Equation complexe3Moebius
27 Feb 25 i   i   i `* Re: Equation complexe2Richard Hachel
28 Feb 25 i   i   i  `- Re: Equation complexe1Chris M. Thomasson
26 Feb 25 i   i   `* Re: Equation complexe30efji
26 Feb 25 i   i    `* Re: Equation complexe29Richard Hachel
26 Feb 25 i   i     +* Re: Equation complexe2Python
27 Feb 25 i   i     i`- Re: Equation complexe1Moebius
27 Feb 25 i   i     `* Re: Equation complexe26joes
27 Feb 25 i   i      `* Re: Equation complexe25Richard Hachel
27 Feb 25 i   i       +- Re: Equation complexe1Python
27 Feb 25 i   i       +* Re: Equation complexe4Jim Burns
27 Feb 25 i   i       i`* Re: Equation complexe3Jim Burns
27 Feb 25 i   i       i `* Re: Equation complexe2Richard Hachel
28 Feb 25 i   i       i  `- Re: Equation complexe1Chris M. Thomasson
28 Feb 25 i   i       `* Re: Equation complexe19Chris M. Thomasson
28 Feb 25 i   i        +* Re: Equation complexe17Richard Hachel
28 Feb 25 i   i        i`* Re: Equation complexe16sobriquet
28 Feb 25 i   i        i `* Re: Equation complexe15Richard Hachel
28 Feb 25 i   i        i  `* Re: Equation complexe14sobriquet
28 Feb 25 i   i        i   `* Re: Equation complexe13Richard Hachel
28 Feb 25 i   i        i    `* Re: Equation complexe12sobriquet
28 Feb 25 i   i        i     +* Re: Equation complexe8Richard Hachel
28 Feb 25 i   i        i     i`* Re: Equation complexe7efji
28 Feb 25 i   i        i     i +* Re: Equation complexe2Richard Hachel
28 Feb 25 i   i        i     i i`- Re: Equation complexe1Jim Burns
28 Feb 25 i   i        i     i +* Re: Equation complexe3Moebius
28 Feb 25 i   i        i     i i`* Re: Equation complexe2Richard Hachel
28 Feb 25 i   i        i     i i `- Re: Equation complexe1Chris M. Thomasson
28 Feb 25 i   i        i     i `- Re: Equation complexe1Richard Hachel
28 Feb 25 i   i        i     `* Re: Equation complexe3Moebius
28 Feb 25 i   i        i      `* Re: Equation complexe2Chris M. Thomasson
28 Feb 25 i   i        i       `- Re: Equation complexe1Chris M. Thomasson
28 Feb 25 i   i        `- Re: Equation complexe1Chris M. Thomasson
27 Feb 25 i   `- Re: Equation complexe1Jim Burns
25 Feb 25 +- Re: Equation complexe1Chris M. Thomasson
25 Feb 25 +* Re: Equation complexe5Chris M. Thomasson
25 Feb 25 i+- Re: Equation complexe1Chris M. Thomasson
25 Feb 25 i`* Re: Equation complexe3Richard Hachel
26 Feb 25 i +- Re: Equation complexe1Chris M. Thomasson
26 Feb 25 i `- Re: Equation complexe1Chris M. Thomasson
25 Feb 25 +* Re: Equation complexe19Chris M. Thomasson
25 Feb 25 i`* Re: Equation complexe18Richard Hachel
25 Feb 25 i +* Re: Equation complexe2Chris M. Thomasson
26 Feb 25 i i`- Re: Equation complexe1Chris M. Thomasson
26 Feb 25 i `* Re: Equation complexe15Chris M. Thomasson
26 Feb 25 i  `* Re: Equation complexe14Richard Hachel
26 Feb 25 i   +* Re: Equation complexe3Chris M. Thomasson
26 Feb 25 i   i`* Re: Equation complexe2Richard Hachel
26 Feb 25 i   i `- Re: Equation complexe1Chris M. Thomasson
26 Feb 25 i   +* Re: Equation complexe3Chris M. Thomasson
26 Feb 25 i   i`* Re: Equation complexe2efji
28 Feb 25 i   i `- Re: Equation complexe1Chris M. Thomasson
26 Feb 25 i   +* Re: Equation complexe2Chris M. Thomasson
26 Feb 25 i   i`- Re: Equation complexe1Chris M. Thomasson
26 Feb 25 i   `* Re: Equation complexe5Barry Schwarz
26 Feb 25 i    +- Re: Equation complexe1Richard Hachel
26 Feb 25 i    `* Re: Equation complexe3Moebius
26 Feb 25 i     `* Re: Equation complexe2Richard Hachel
26 Feb 25 i      `- Re: Equation complexe1Python
25 Feb 25 +- Re: Equation complexe1Barry Schwarz
28 Feb 25 `- Re: Equation complexe1Chris M. Thomasson

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal