Re: New equation

On 02/27/2025 01:46 AM, efji wrote:

Le 27/02/2025 à 05:19, Ross Finlayson a écrit :
>

>
Division in complex numbers is opinionated, not unique.

>
:)
Hachel has a brother !
>

>
So, the natural products and alll their combinations
don't necessarily arrive at "staying in the system".

>
wow
>

>
Furthermore, in things like Fourier-style analysis,
which often enough employ numerical methods a.k.a.
approximations here the small-angle approximation
in their derivations, _always have a non-zero error_.

>
big time BS :)
>

>
Then, something like the "identity dimension", sees
instead of going _out_ in the numbers, where complex
numbers and their iterative products may neatly model
reflections and rotations, instead go _in_ the numbers,
making for the envelope of the linear fractional equation,
Clairaut's and d'Alembert's equations, and otherwise
with regards to _integral_ analysis vis-a-vis the
_differential_ analysis.

>
Nonsense ala Hachel
>

>
These each have things the other can't implement,
yet somehow they're part of one thing.
>
It's called completions since mathematics is replete.

>
A BS-philosophical version of Hachel. Let's park them together.
>

Division in complex numbers most surely is
non-unique, whatever troll you are from
whatever troll rock you crawled out from under.
Furthermore, if you don't know usual derivations
of Fourier-style analysis and for example about
that the small-angle approximation is a linearisation
and is an approximation and is after a numerical method,
you do _not_ know.
Then about integral analysis and this sort of
"original analysis" and about the identity line
being the envelope of these very usual integral
equations, it certainly is so.
So, crawl back under your troll rock, troll worm.
I discovered a new equation one time, it's another
expression for factorial, sort of like Stirling's,
upon which some quite usual criteria for convergence die.