Re: What if Carl Friedrich Gauss was wrong?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à math 
Sujet : Re: What if Carl Friedrich Gauss was wrong?
De : jp (at) *nospam* python.invalid (Python)
Groupes : sci.math
Date : 01. Mar 2025, 16:58:17
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <HAo9FU5gckMIorBJ98-xptfjYR8@jntp>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Nemo/1.0
Le 01/03/2025 à 16:57, Ross Finlayson a écrit :
On 03/01/2025 07:43 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
On 03/01/2025 06:52 AM, Python wrote:
Le 01/03/2025 à 03:29, Ross Finlayson a écrit :
[snip nonsense]
>
Of course many people are familiar with the theorem that
the complex numbers are a complete ordered field and so
are the real numbers and that's unique up to isomorphism,
yet for example I wrote field operations equipping [-1, 1]
with field operations, another, different, complete ordered
field.
>
Complex numbers form a complete field but NOT an ordered field.
>
>
>
Yeah, now that you mention it, an ordering would
be a bit contrived, ....
>
>
 It's usually enough called "Gaussian screw arithmetic"
or "Wick rotation".
Hmm... Not quite. This is just name dropping.

Also there's another one on [-1, 1].
Interesting? Which is?
Date Sujet#  Auteur
1 Mar 25 * What if Carl Friedrich Gauss was wrong?9Richard Hachel
1 Mar 25 `* Re: What if Carl Friedrich Gauss was wrong?8sobriquet
1 Mar 25  +* Re: What if Carl Friedrich Gauss was wrong?6Ross Finlayson
1 Mar 25  i`* Re: What if Carl Friedrich Gauss was wrong?5Python
1 Mar 25  i `* Re: What if Carl Friedrich Gauss was wrong?4Ross Finlayson
1 Mar 25  i  `* Re: What if Carl Friedrich Gauss was wrong?3Ross Finlayson
1 Mar 25  i   `* Re: What if Carl Friedrich Gauss was wrong?2Python
1 Mar 25  i    `- Re: What if Carl Friedrich Gauss was wrong?1Ross Finlayson
1 Mar 25  `- Re: What if Carl Friedrich Gauss was wrong?1Richard Hachel

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal