Sujet : Re: What if Carl Friedrich Gauss was wrong?
De : jp (at) *nospam* python.invalid (Python)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 01. Mar 2025, 16:58:17
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <HAo9FU5gckMIorBJ98-xptfjYR8@jntp>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Nemo/1.0
Le 01/03/2025 à 16:57, Ross Finlayson a écrit :
On 03/01/2025 07:43 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
On 03/01/2025 06:52 AM, Python wrote:
Le 01/03/2025 à 03:29, Ross Finlayson a écrit :
[snip nonsense]
>
Of course many people are familiar with the theorem that
the complex numbers are a complete ordered field and so
are the real numbers and that's unique up to isomorphism,
yet for example I wrote field operations equipping [-1, 1]
with field operations, another, different, complete ordered
field.
>
Complex numbers form a complete field but NOT an ordered field.
>
>
>
Yeah, now that you mention it, an ordering would
be a bit contrived, ....
>
>
It's usually enough called "Gaussian screw arithmetic"
or "Wick rotation".
Hmm... Not quite. This is just name dropping.
Also there's another one on [-1, 1].
Interesting? Which is?