Re: New equation

Le 02/03/2025 à 02:49, Richard Hachel a écrit :

Le 02/03/2025 à 00:27, Jim Burns a écrit :

On 3/1/2025 5:54 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:

 

If so, why?

 I think that complex numbers need to be reconsidered from the beginning, as I did for the special theory of relativity, in order to have something perfectly beautiful, coherent, simple and logical.
Beauty is the splendor of truth.
The later blunders of physicists on the Poincaré-Lorentz transformations (however magnificent) are not beautiful, so they are not true.
Their supposed beauty comes from artifice, not from the real essence of things, and in the end, SR is rotten with mathematical falsehoods.
It is the same for complex numbers. Professors teach it badly, and most often without understanding anything of the things they draw or explain.
So all this is not true.
We live in the permanent illusion of understanding things that we do not clearly understand, whereas if we were to remove the conceptual confusion, everything would be clear and obvious.
 R.H.

This is delusional bullshit, Richard.