Sujet : Re: The set of necessary FISONs
De : wolfgang.mueckenheim (at) *nospam* tha.de (WM)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 03. Mar 2025, 22:56:46
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vq58iu$1ftht$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 03.03.2025 20:26, Jim Burns wrote:
On 3/3/2025 3:57 AM, WM wrote:
Zermelo's ℕ and Cantor's ℕ are the same
up to isomorphism.
No. Zermelo uses induction which never goes beyond a finite number of finite numbers.
Cantor claims a number of finite numbers which is larger than all finite numbers.
But that is not the topic. The topic is this: In exactly the same way as Z₀ is constructed by its elements, the set of removable FISONs is constructed by its elements, namely by induction.
Do you agree?
Regards, WM