Sujet : Re: Collatz conjecture question
De : invalid (at) *nospam* example.invalid (Moebius)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 24. Mar 2025, 18:37:13
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vrs589$1bjga$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Am 24.03.2025 um 18:11 schrieb Python:
Le 24/03/2025 à 16:58, Richard Hachel a écrit :
I set i° = -1, i² = -1, (i²)² = -1
Your "postulate" can be disputed, like all postulate. As it is inconsistent (it leads to contradiction) it has to be rejected. PERIOD.
Indeed.
From Hachel's postulates we get: i² = -1 and hence (-1)² = (i²)² = -1. But (-1)² = (-1)*(-1) = 1 (and 1 =/= -1) (following "standard" math).
Again, from his claim "i^x = -1" (for all "numbers" x), we might get i = i^1 = -1 (since 1 certainly might be a "number"). Hence: i = -1. But then i² = i * i = (-1)*(-1) = 1 (following "standard" math). While one of Hachel's postulates is i² = -1. [...]