Re: Relativistic aberration

Liste des GroupesRevenir à physics 
Sujet : Re: Relativistic aberration
De : hitlong (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 13. Aug 2024, 00:44:32
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <03d91192917665366eed4777e19eeaba@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 18:05:52 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
W dniu 12.08.2024 o 19:51, gharnagel pisze:
>
On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 15:30:56 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
No, trash. It was oppositely.
>
I'm deathly afraid Wozniak is lying again.
>
In response to your fellow idiots -
"nazi antisemite", "Polish drunkard full of
bottles of vodka" "licking toilets inside
janitor"... sounds familiar?
Nope.  I never said those things.

Talking to fanatic lying relativistic scumbags
I had sadly to  partially descend to their level.
Partially.
But Wozniak sinks immediately to insults, slander
and a a big juicy lie :-))

I've told you precisely and 2 or 3 times
where it is made. In the base.
>
The "base"?  A baseball base?  A solution with
pH > 7?  An air force base?
>
We were talking about GPS clocks - one in a ground
GPS base,
A GPS "base"?  Where is it?  WHAT is it?  Look it
up on your brozer, what do you get?  Something you
can buy on Amazon.  Is THAT what you mean?

the other on a satellite.
No one has access to what the satellite clock actually
reads AT the satellite.

Do you know now what base, or are you too stupid
even for that?
Ah, Wozniak debases himself again by sinking to insults
and personal attacks.
I know what controls the satellites:
https://www.gps.gov/systems/gps/control/
something that Wozniak doesn't seem to be aware of.

So, let's try again: so, when t(time indicated
by a ground base clock) is 2024-08-31
17:00:00.00000000 - t' (time indicated by
a satellite clock) will be? Consider the
simultaneity of the base.
It's SO strange that a self-proclaimed "engineer"
doesn't understand when something like the GPS is
being ENGINEERED.  Again, either he is stupid or
he's being dishonest.  As I said, I don't believe
he's stupid.  Considering all the evidence that's
coming out about an afterlife,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/21_grams_experiment
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_After_Life_(Moody_book)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heaven_Is_for_Real
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miracles_from_Heaven
he should really be worried about his future:
"But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the
abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers,
and sorcerers, and idolaters, and ALL LIARS,
shall have their part in the lake which burneth
with fire and brimstone: which is the second
death." -- Revelation 21:8
He seems to think that the reading received
from the satellite by a GPS receiver (THAT'S
a GPS "base") compared to what a GPS receiver
clock reads "proves" something.
How duplicitous!  The receiver is updated BY
the GPS signal, so the two will OBVIOUSLY
agree :-))

And your answer is?
Let me guess: more lies, more slanders,
more insults.
>
Nope.  Wozniak does enough of those to send ten
men to the lake of fire and brimstone.  He lies
by omission of all the confirmations of relativity
and focuses on the GPS which was engineered to
overcome the innate non-simultaneity between the
earth clocks and the orbiting clocks.  His whole
assertion is a sham, a con, a lie.
>
I've guessed correctly. Of course.
A "guess" by Wozniak is less reliable than his hollow
assertions about the GPS :-)

Date Sujet#  Auteur
23 Dec 24 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal