Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?

W dniu 03.04.2024 o 07:39, Python pisze:

Le 03/04/2024 à 07:15, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 02.04.2024 o 23:39, Python pisze:

Le 02/04/2024 à 22:59, Richard Hachel a écrit :

Le 02/04/2024 à 21:10, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 02.04.2024 o 20:39, Python pisze:
>

You are an incurable hypocrite, Richard.
>
And a pathological liar.

All the worshippers  of your idiot guru are.
BTW, have you already learnt what a function is?

>
I pay no attention to the criticisms of Jean-Pierre Python, he is known on physics forums for being a clown.
He doesn't understand anything, and gets mixed up on the problems of special relativity that he thinks he has mastered and which he doesn't master at all. He nevertheless believes himself to be the world's best critic in physical and mathematical science.

>
Absolutely not, I have not the kind of delusion of grandeur you have.
>
You are the one with absolutely no education in science and no will to

>
Oh, stinker Python is opening its muzzle again,
and trying again to pretend he knows something.
Tell me, poor stinker, have you already learnt
what a function is? Is "for any element of
the domain" clause still confusing you?

 https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Application_(math%C3%A9matiques)
 "Le terme est concurrencé par celui de fonction, bien que celui-ci désigne parfois plus spécifiquement les applications dont le but est un ensemble de nombres et parfois, au contraire, englobe plus largement les relations pour lesquelles chaque élément de l'ensemble de départ est relié à au plus un élément de l'ensemble d'arrivée."
 Now shut the fuck up, idiot...

Still confused; you're such an idiot.
Well, under the link you provided -
click blue "fonction" word and read:
En mathématiques, une fonction permet de définir un résultat (le plus souvent numérique) pour chaque élément d’un ensemble appelé domaine.
Of course, whatever you'll read, being
stupid is not curable.