Re: Perfect clocks

W dniu 29.04.2024 o 14:27, gharnagel pisze:

Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
W dniu 28.04.2024 o 11:40, Mikko pisze:

>
On 2024-04-27 19:50:34 +0000, gharnagel said:

Perhaps there is only one nature, but it has many parts.

The discussion seems to be about the part of nature called
"time" ...
Time is not a part of nature. If you remove time and everthing

that is in a time or is a part of time or is a property of time
or requires time to exist then nothing is left.

but what is "time"?

Many things are called "time".

>
Does every of them have the property above,
poor halfbrain?

 That should be "Do all of them," quarterbrain.

And that's because...?

Time is a tool for describing things.

 So Wozzie believes time is a tool, invented, not a concept. 

Of course it's a concept. Concepts are invented.
His

problem is that he just proved that what Mikko said is correct.

Which one? He said 2 things, generally
excluding each other, as expected from
a relativistic idiot.

Wozzie is dishonest because he takes only a part of the answer
and pretends that it's ALL of the answer.

Harrie, on the other hand, is dishonest because
he lies impudently.

 

If you take it away - everything stays as it is, you
just can't  say a word about it anymore.

 So Wozzie quarterbrain believes if we didn't have clocks all
processes of nature would stop?

Nope. Oppositely - you and your fellow idiot Mikko
believe that, because - with all of  your mystical
nonsensens - you're still defining time as "what
clocks indicate". Or don't you?
   Weird!!

 https://video.search.yahoo.com/search/video?fr=ymyy-t&ei=UTF-8&p=my+grandfather%27s+clock#id=2&vid=47e1d2d247b785182417aa9d93eaa0df&action=click
 True, clocks are tools, but time is a concept

It is.
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/concept
How did you imagine an idea can't be a tool? And
how did you imagine that nature is creating ideas?