Re: Space and spacetime

W dniu 20.06.2024 o 15:45, gharnagel pisze:

Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
W dniu 20.06.2024 o 14:26, gharnagel pisze:

>
Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
W dniu 20.06.2024 o 00:09, gharnagel pisze:

>
Wozzie posts nothing but repetitions and lies.
He claims to be an information whatsit, claims science is
information, then denies a major part of science.

>
See, trash - I've proven the idiocies
of your insane guru to be not even consistent,
Just more repetitions and lies.  That's all Wozzie has.  Why

doesn't he post his "proof" of give a link to it?

>
Just more repetitions and lies.  That's all Harrie has.
Posted the proof dosens of times here and will post
it many times more, be sure, trash.

 Wozzie is delusional, pretending he has posted "proofs" when

OK, trash - an observer going with c/2 through
Solar system is going to measure the length of
a day. What is the prediction of the physics
of your idiot guru for the result? No precision
better than 1% needed.

and you can do nothing about it apart of
barking, lying and slandering.
Says the repetitious barker, liar and slanderer :-)

 Wozzie agrees that he is a barker, liar and slanderer since he

No, I don't. You'rea barker, liar and slanderer,
but that was obvious before.

 

But you'll do what you can for your moronic church -
that's what it trains its doggies for, after all.
I can actually "prove" that the LT is correct in its domain

of applicability based on actual [gasp!] information.

 

I'm sure you can prove LT are correct where they
are correct; evan such an idiot should be able to
manage such a task.
Have nothing against Lorentz and his transformations,
anyway.

 They demonstrate that t' <> t

Nope, they need the interpretation of a relativistic
idiot for that.
, which explodes Wozzie's "proof."

So he has just admitted that he lied.

No,I didn't. Even such a piece of lying
shit as Harrie is can't lie 100% of time,
but it still can lie most of the time.

I do and it is.

 Only partly.  A whole body of information.
 

Samely as whole science is.

 That's where Wozzie goes off the rails.  He ignores the
most important part.
 

And thus, none of your noble specializations could
mark you as an  invincible expert about it.
You've just self-appointed yourself for that,
as expected from a DK idiot.

  Pot, kettle black :-)

I'm actually an information engineer, poor
trash. That's the specialization of dealing
with information and its various constructs.
No way I'm an invincible expert, of course...
we could discuss, if you weren't such an
arrogant not-even-layman idiot.

 

and then denies the information of physics.

 

Of course. What is inconsistent in denying
some information concocted by some religious
maniacs?

  Wozzie makes a biased judgment on the source of the
information rather than the information itself.

Nope. Another slander from a lying piece of
shit.

He says he has no problem with the LT, so does he
accept that c + v = c?

Tell me better, poor trash, whether you accept
that Lorentz has prepared his transformations for
his own  ether theory, not  for The Shit of your
idiot guru?