Re: Energy?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à physics 
Sujet : Re: Energy?
De : mlwozniak (at) *nospam* wp.pl (Maciej Wozniak)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 31. Jul 2024, 21:43:47
Autres entêtes
Organisation : NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-ID : <17e766fee8072224$32990$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
W dniu 31.07.2024 o 17:30, gharnagel pisze:
On Wed, 31 Jul 2024 8:30:15 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
W dniu 31.07.2024 o 10:02, J. J. Lodder pisze:
>
A somewhat jocular, but practical working proper definition is:
Energy is 1/2 m v^2, and everything else that is missing from the law
of
conservation of energy.
>
And thus - conservation of energy, your alleged
"law of nature" is really a simple language truism
(and it's not a critique, just stating the fact).
 So Wozzie doesn't believe energy conservation is a
law?
Herrie, poor halfbrain, you're free to
believe  The Nature herself speaking to Chosen
Ones and reveal Her Laws for repeating to
little ones; but  only  idiots like you
can believe  such crap.
With the definition above - your "law" is
a simple truism, and some  fanatic idiots
screaming "NOOOOOO!!!!" change nothing.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
23 Dec 24 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal