Re: How Einstein's worshippers fabricated evidence against basic math

Liste des GroupesRevenir à physics 
Sujet : Re: How Einstein's worshippers fabricated evidence against basic math
De : mlwozniak (at) *nospam* wp.pl (Maciej Wozniak)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 07. Aug 2024, 16:30:13
Autres entêtes
Organisation : NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-ID : <17e978ac1c30fcb8$189489$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
W dniu 07.08.2024 o 16:22, Python pisze:
Le 07/08/2024 à 16:19, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
W dniu 07.08.2024 o 16:04, Python pisze:
Le 07/08/2024 à 16:01, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
https://www.gutenberg.org/files/37157/37157-pdf.pdf
>
1908 - nothing about so trendy nowadays
"counterexamples" against Euclidean
prejudices allegedly found in massive numbers
on Earth surface.
>
non sequitur.
>
What "non sequitur", poor stinker?
Did  P mention such counterexamples
or not?
No answer? Of course, poor stinker.
>
>
>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poincar%C3%A9_disk_model
>
out of topic.
>
[???] have invented them after [???] announced EG false...
>
Nobody "announced Euclidean Geometry false". You don't
>
So, is Vth axiom and Pythagorean theorem
true  according to your idiotic religion?
True for real, poor stinker?
Even the lower ranks of your moronic church
didn't buy this absurd lie, and openly declare
EG as some delusion of an old Greek. Sorry,
trash.
 It is pointless to discuss (again!) these points with someone
That's why I'm not trfying to discuss
you at all, poor stinker. Just occassionally
kick your dumb, fanatic ass.
And whatever you say - Poincare had enough wit
to understand how idiotic rejecting Euclid
would be, and he has written it clearly
enough for anyone able to read (even if not
clearly enough for you, poor stinker).

Date Sujet#  Auteur
6 Oct 24 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal