Re: Relativistic aberration

W dniu 12.08.2024 o 14:53, gharnagel pisze:

On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 4:33:02 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
W dniu 11.08.2024 o 22:19, gharnagel pisze:

>
On Sun, 11 Aug 2024 18:07:25 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
W dniu 11.08.2024 o 19:49, gharnagel pisze:

>
Clocks are human inventions, so smart humans will set
them to agree with natural phenomena.

>
Sorry, trash, they won't.

>
Denigration and prevarication aren't valid arguments.
>

Anyone can check GPS - oppositely, they will set them
to ignore natutral phenomena.

>
Wozniak asserts that "t' = t" in the GPS system, but he

>
Harrie asserts t'<>t,

 Do I?  How could I without knowing what t' and t are? :-))
 

but when asked what t' is then - he's only spitting,
insulting and slandering.

 I wasn't the one calling people "trash"

You've used many others insults instead.
And slanders as well.
True, talking to fanatic, lying scumbags
like you, Python and others I sadly have
to partially descend to your level.
Partially.

Let's try again: so, when t(time indicated
by a ground base clock) is 2024-08-31
17:00:00.00000000 - t' (time indicated by
a satellite clock) will be? Consider the
simultaneity of the base.

 Wozniak doesn't say WHERE the measurement of the
satellite clock is made.  Of course,

Harrie lies and desperately tries
to pretend that an answer different
than "2024-08-31 17:00:00.00000000
with the precision of an acceptable
error" exists.
I've written it clearly: consider the
simultaneity of the base. Not that it
makes any difference outside of  the
gedanken world of your absurd delusions
- but you've got it.
Lies have short legs, sorry, trash.