Re: Perfect clocks

Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
W dniu 28.04.2024 o 11:40, Mikko pisze:

>
On 2024-04-27 19:50:34 +0000, gharnagel said:

 Perhaps there is only one nature, but it has many parts.
The discussion seems to be about the part of nature called
"time" ...

 Time is not a part of nature. If you remove time and everthing
that is in a time or is a part of time or is a property of time
or requires time to exist then nothing is left.
 

but what is "time"?

 Many things are called "time".

>
Does every of them have the property above,
poor halfbrain?

That should be "Do all of them," quarterbrain.

Time is a tool for describing things.

So Wozzie believes time is a tool, invented, not a concept.  His
problem is that he just proved that what Mikko said is correct.
Wozzie is dishonest because he takes only a part of the answer
and pretends that it's ALL of the answer.

If you take it away - everything stays as it is, you
just can't  say a word about it anymore.

So Wozzie quarterbrain believes if we didn't have clocks all
processes of nature would stop?  Weird!!
https://video.search.yahoo.com/search/video?fr=ymyy-t&ei=UTF-8&p=my+grandfather%27s+clock#id=2&vid=47e1d2d247b785182417aa9d93eaa0df&action=click
True, clocks are tools, but time is a concept.  Wozzie confuses
the two, just like he does practically everything else.