Re: "Time" vs "physical time"

Liste des GroupesRevenir à physics 
Sujet : Re: "Time" vs "physical time"
De : nospam (at) *nospam* de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 08. Aug 2024, 21:36:48
Autres entêtes
Organisation : De Ster
Message-ID : <66b52c61$0$18416$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : MacSOUP/2.8.5 (ea919cf118) (Mac OS 10.12.6)
Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> wrote:

Le 08/08/2024 à 21:18, nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) a écrit :
 
Does your peculiar physics predict a measured speed of c
for the highly relativistic neutrinos,
and if not, what else?
 
 Your lack of knowledge in Hachelian physics is once again apparent.

Indeed, quite. Only Hachel knows about Hachelian physics.

Do you honestly believe that I am going to answer you with anything other
than what I have already said?

So say it again. Does Hachelian physics predict an observed speed of c
for relativistic neutrinos traveling the 732 km from CERN to Gran Sasso?
(with the clocks at CERN and Gran Sasso synchronised by GPS)

Yes or no will do,

Jan


Date Sujet#  Auteur
23 Dec 24 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal