Re: Relativistic aberration

Liste des GroupesRevenir à physics 
Sujet : Re: Relativistic aberration
De : hitlong (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 12. Aug 2024, 16:23:27
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <681e5da0c29b77655518c42513463f0a@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 13:21:58 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
W dniu 12.08.2024 o 14:53, gharnagel pisze:
>
On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 4:33:02 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
Harrie asserts t'<>t,
>
Do I?  How could I without knowing what t' and t are? :-))
>
but when asked what t' is then - he's only spitting,
insulting and slandering.
>
I wasn't the one calling people "trash"
>
You've used many others insults instead.
And slanders as well.
Only in response to Wozniak's insults and slanders.  He
simply fails to understand basic human decency and karma.

True, talking to fanatic, lying scumbags
like you, Python and others I sadly have
to partially descend to your level.
Partially.
Au contraire.  It's that others have condescended
to HIS level.

Let's try again: so, when t(time indicated
by a ground base clock) is 2024-08-31
17:00:00.00000000 - t' (time indicated by
a satellite clock) will be? Consider the
simultaneity of the base.
>
Wozniak doesn't say WHERE the measurement of the
satellite clock is made.  Of course,
>
Harrie lies and desperately tries
to pretend that an answer different
than "2024-08-31 17:00:00.00000000
with the precision of an acceptable
error" exists.
Of course different answers exist, depending
on where the measurement is made.  Wozniak
wants desperately to exclude all those other
places so he can "disprove" relativity.  This
is the crux of his dishonesty.

I've written it clearly: consider the
simultaneity of the base. Not that it
makes any difference outside of  the
gedanken world of your absurd delusions
- but you've got it.
And more examples of his insults and slanders.
"And what does "simultaneity of the base"
supposed to mean?  More ambiguous inanity.
How can simultaneity be anything but a
tautology when considering only one place?
The word "base" pops up out of nowhere, too.

Lies have short legs, sorry, trash.
“Let me never fall into the vulgar mistake of
dreaming that I am persecuted whenever I am
contradicted.” -- Ralph Waldo Emerson
All Wozniak has is baseless opinion and
perversion of observation.  He studiously
ignores all evidences that demolish his pet
fantasies.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
6 Oct 24 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal