Re: "Time" vs "physical time"

Liste des GroupesRevenir à physics 
Sujet : Re: "Time" vs "physical time"
De : r.hachel (at) *nospam* jesauspu.fr (Richard Hachel)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 08. Aug 2024, 21:43:26
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <JQP4zy9jD3AZXRuP-EZSv58-TFw@jntp>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Nemo/0.999a
Le 08/08/2024 à 22:36, nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) a écrit :
 So say it again. Does Hachelian physics predict an observed speed of c
for relativistic neutrinos traveling the 732 km from CERN to Gran Sasso?
(with the clocks at CERN and Gran Sasso synchronised by GPS)
 Yes or no will do,  Jan
All good relativistic physics must predict an OBSERVABLE speed of the neutrino perfectly equal to c.
If a physics does not do it, it is not good.
On the other hand, all physicists must experimentally note that the neutrino has this speed, and that no other particle or law of nature can exceed it.
The cause is the universal anisochrony against which we cannot, because we are in a concrete physics where we cannot do everything we want, resist or contradict.
R.H.
Date Sujet#  Auteur
23 Dec 24 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal