Sujet : Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets
De : richard (at) *nospam* damon-family.org (Richard Damon)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 30. Mar 2024, 18:47:21
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <uu9j79$3gijc$8@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 3/30/24 12:01 PM, WM wrote:
Le 29/03/2024 à 14:29, Richard Damon a écrit :
And, it can be shown that ℕ and ℚ are the same size.
That is believed by some stupids who are too dense to understand logic. The Os in the matrix
XOOO...
XOOO...
XOOO...
XOOO...
..
cannot disappear by exchange with Xs.
So?
That isn't the Bijection we are looking for.
>
Nope, Removing a single element from an infinite set doesn't change its size.
That is believed by some stupids who are too dense to understand logic. Removing one element makes the set having one element less than before.
Regrads, WM
Which doesn't affect the "size" of infinity.
DEFINITIONS you know.
…