Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.

Liste des GroupesRevenir à physics 
Sujet : Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.
De : volney (at) *nospam* invalid.invalid (Volney)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 28. Apr 2024, 15:10:59
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v0lht5$129m2$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 4/27/2024 4:41 AM, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
On 2024-04-26 15:15:06 +0000, Jim Pennino said:
 
In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
Jim Pennino wrote:
>
In sci.physics Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
Le 26/04/2024 à 06:40, Ross Finlayson a écrit :
On 04/25/2024 12:43 PM, Obed Erdélyi wrote:
Jim Pennino wrote:
>
In sci.physics.electromag Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com>
wrote:  <snip>
Einstein's theories are pure nonsense.
>
Just because you can't understand them doesn't make them wrong,
crackpot.
>
I do understand they are nonsense.
>
That is your understanding because you are utterly clueless about math
and science in general, crackpot.
>
<snip crackpot babble>
>
Penisnino's Law: Smaller the penis, greater the pee.
>
>
And yet another 9 year old pipes up...
 There is a theory in another group that bertietaylor is a nym of Arindam Banerjee. However, their styles are sufficiently different to make that unlikely.
 
It is. "bertietaylor" screws up and writes (under the bertietaylor nym):
That is not the case, so this is a new discovery - the Lorentz force does NOT have an equal and opposite reaction.
Your point is merely theoretical.
My evidence is experimental.
"My" evidence.
A possibility is an emergence of multiple personality disorder where the personalities are not fully separate yet.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
6 Oct 24 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal