Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?

Le 31/03/2024 à 14:07, "Paul B. Andersen" a écrit :

Den 30.03.2024 14:31, skrev Richard Hachel:

SR is a consistent theory.

No.
She is inconsistent and ridiculous in front of a simple doctor (me)
who tells him that there is a Langevin paradox and that no one for 120 years has succeeded in solving it.
It is common knowledge that one can only respond to him with hatred and insult.
Which is NOT scientific.
She is completely wrong in accelerated frames of reference and rotating frames of reference. It is not normal.
Special Relativity is incapable of approving what Richard Hachel says, and can only always, always, always lower its pants, which is NOT NORMAL.
If Richard Hachel says: "Stella's time is 9 years for the return", are the physicists in their pants? And why? Because it's false? No way! Because it's true, and they know it, and they teach it, but it would hurt them to admit it.
If Richard Hachel says: "The apparent speed of an object moving at 0.8c, it is 4c, if the object is moving towards me". They answer: "No, we know it's true, but if you say it, because you're scum, they'll say it's not true."
All this enters into madness on their part, but into the most intelligent of madness, that of hatred and massive refutation.
All this to block the way for anyone who says: “Hachel is right, and 9*4=36”.
It is to say the opposite which is inconsistent.
It's a stupid cock contest.
“We don’t want this man to rule over us.”
It's very Freudian, even on the scale of the biggest names in world science.
R.H.