Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo

Liste des GroupesRevenir à physics 
Sujet : Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo
De : mlwozniak (at) *nospam* wp.pl (Maciej Wozniak)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity sci.physics
Date : 23. Sep 2024, 22:00:17
Autres entêtes
Organisation : NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-ID : <17f7f7f5b46186da$2$822353$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
W dniu 23.09.2024 o 21:30, Jim Pennino pisze:
In sci.physics Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
W dniu 23.09.2024 o 20:45, Jim Pennino pisze:
In sci.physics Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
W dniu 23.09.2024 o 19:02, Jim Pennino pisze:
In sci.physics Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
W dniu 23.09.2024 o 17:31, Jim Pennino pisze:
>
See, poor insane crackpot - I've proven the mumble
of your idiot  guru to be not even consistent, and
you can  do nothing about it apart of raving, spitting
and insulting.
But you will do what you can for your beloved
Shit and your beloved church.
>
Incoherent gibberish.
>
>
See, poor insane crackpot - I've proven the mumble
of your idiot  guru to be not even consistent, and
you can  do nothing about it apart of raving, spitting
and insulting.
But you will do what you can for your beloved
Shit and your beloved church.
    Yet more incoherent gibberish.
>
>
See, poor insane crackpot - I've proven the mumble
of your idiot  guru to be not even consistent, and
you can  do nothing about it apart of raving, spitting
and insulting.
But you will do what you can for your beloved
Shit and your beloved church.
>
And - no experiment has ever said that the idiot
was correct, like many religious maniacs of all
kind - you're hearing voices.
>
>
And yet more incoherent gibberish.
>
See, poor insane crackpot - I've proven the mumble
of your idiot  guru to be not even consistent, and
you can  do nothing about it apart of raving, spitting
and insulting.
But you will do what you can for your beloved
Shit and your beloved church.
>
And - no experiment has ever said that the idiot
was correct, like many religious maniacs of all
kind - you're hearing voices.
>
 And yet again, nothing but incoherent mental patient gibberish.
 
And yet again:
See, poor insane crackpot - I've proven the mumble
of your idiot  guru to be not even consistent, and
you can  do nothing about it apart of raving, spitting
and insulting.
But you will do what you can for your beloved
Shit and your beloved church.
And - no experiment has ever said that the idiot
was correct, like many religious maniacs of all
kind - you're hearing voices.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
17 Sep 24 * Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo59bertietaylor
17 Sep 24 +* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo19Jim Pennino
18 Sep 24 i`* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo18bertietaylor
18 Sep 24 i `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo17Jim Pennino
18 Sep 24 i  `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo16bertietaylor
18 Sep 24 i   `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo15Jim Pennino
19 Sep 24 i    `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo14bertietaylor
19 Sep 24 i     `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo13Jim Pennino
19 Sep 24 i      +* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo6bertietaylor
19 Sep 24 i      i`* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo5Jim Pennino
19 Sep 24 i      i `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo4bertietaylor
20 Sep 24 i      i  `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo3Jim Pennino
20 Sep 24 i      i   `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo2bertietaylor
20 Sep 24 i      i    `- Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo1Jim Pennino
25 Sep 24 i      +- Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo1palsing
25 Sep 24 i      `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo5palsing
26 Sep 24 i       `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo4bertietaylor
26 Sep 24 i        `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo3Jim Pennino
26 Sep 24 i         +- Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo1bertietaylor
1 Oct23:50 i         `- Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo1Maciej Wozniak
21 Sep 24 +* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo34bertietaylor
21 Sep 24 i`* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo33Jim Pennino
21 Sep 24 i `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo32bertietaylor
21 Sep 24 i  `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo31Jim Pennino
22 Sep 24 i   `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo30bertietaylor
22 Sep 24 i    `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo29Jim Pennino
22 Sep 24 i     `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo28bertietaylor
22 Sep 24 i      `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo27Jim Pennino
22 Sep 24 i       +* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo20Jim Pennino
23 Sep 24 i       i`* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo19Jim Pennino
23 Sep 24 i       i `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo18Jim Pennino
23 Sep 24 i       i  `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo17Jim Pennino
23 Sep 24 i       i   `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo16Maciej Wozniak
23 Sep 24 i       i    `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo15Jim Pennino
23 Sep 24 i       i     `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo14Maciej Wozniak
23 Sep 24 i       i      `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo13Jim Pennino
24 Sep 24 i       i       +* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo11bertietaylor
24 Sep 24 i       i       i`* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo10Jim Pennino
24 Sep 24 i       i       i +- Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo1bertietaylor
24 Sep 24 i       i       i `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo8ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
24 Sep 24 i       i       i  +- Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo1Maciej Wozniak
25 Sep 24 i       i       i  +* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo2Physfitfreak
25 Sep 24 i       i       i  i`- Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo1bertietaylor
25 Sep 24 i       i       i  `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo4J. J. Lodder
25 Sep 24 i       i       i   `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo3Athel Cornish-Bowden
25 Sep 24 i       i       i    `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo2Edward McGuire
26 Sep 24 i       i       i     `- Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo1Athel Cornish-Bowden
24 Sep 24 i       i       `- Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo1Maciej Wozniak
23 Sep 24 i       `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo6bertietaylor
23 Sep 24 i        `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo5Jim Pennino
23 Sep 24 i         `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo4bertietaylor
23 Sep 24 i          `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo3Jim Pennino
24 Sep 24 i           `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo2bertietaylor
25 Sep 24 i            `- Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo1bertietaylor
26 Sep 24 `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo5bertietaylor
26 Sep 24  `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo4Jim Pennino
26 Sep 24   `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo3bertietaylor
27 Sep 24    `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo2Jim Pennino
28 Sep 24     `- Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo1bertietaylor

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal