Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam

On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 3:52:17 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:

In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:

On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 0:59:14 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>

In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:

On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 21:43:28 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>

In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:

On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 23:03:14 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>

In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:

On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 21:30:05 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>

In sci.physics Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:

W dniu 02.10.2024 o 02:51, Jim Pennino pisze:

In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:

On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 9:06:50 +0000, bertietaylor wrote:
>

What follows from Arindamic physics is the permanent motion machine,
creating energy indefinitely. A minor version of the workings of the
universe, where energy is created and disdipated in its infinite
vastness.
>
Arindam bets that when he makes such a machine the penisninos (they
number in billions) will still continue to abuse and ignore him. Frauds
and fools are like that!

>
Apes being apes, ape. No matter what nonsense is spouted by beloved or
feared alpha-apes. That explains the success of relativity theories, so
incredibly ridiculous.

>
The success of relativity theories is because every experiment since
1905
confirms them,

>
No, it is because some fanatic religious
maniacs like yourself lie experiments
confirm them.

>
So where is your experiment with data and math that contradicts Einstein
or are you just yet another arm waving and babbling crackpot?

>
The inertia violation experiment using the new rail gun designed by
Arindam validates Maxwellian electrodynamics and throws out
Einstein-Feynman electrodynamics. As lack of reaction is predicted by
F=Bil for the former and NOT by the latter where energy from current
moves as particles in a loop.

>
You mean your silly "expriment" with no data and no math Anirandam?

>
Unlike the computer art presented as science by the esteemed e=mcc

>
The first experimental proofs of Einstein's theories were done long
before there was any such thing as computer art crackpot.

>
There are no experimental proofs of Einstein's theories,

>
Thousand upon thousand Arindam.

>
Name one.

>
OK, since you seem so hung up on e=mc^2 I'll start with special
relativity.
>
Fizeau experiment

Irrelevant

Michelson–Morley experiment

Biggest bungle in science as pointed out by Arindam in 2005.

Kaufmann–Bucherer–Neumann experiments
Trouton–Noble experiment
Rayleigh and Brace experiments
Trouton–Rankine experiment
Ives–Stilwell experiment

All bollocks after the MMI bungle which shows light speed varies with
the speed of emitter.
That bungle ked to the corruption of physics and its replacement by
pseudo-scientific claptrap.

>
That gets us to 1938.

And after that the frauds got total control with the atom bomb which was
supposedly explained by e=mcc. Actually just fear, propaganda, math
bull, personality cults, money power, awards, ever more nonsense with
mathematics hocus-pocus... Arindam slaughtered them all with his kinetic
formula relating mass and energy that is e=0.5mvvN(N-k)
Woof-woof
Bertietaylor