Sujet : Re: The Orange One
De : jimp (at) *nospam* gonzo.specsol.net (Jim Pennino)
Groupes : sci.physics sci.physics.relativitySuivi-à : sci.physicsDate : 02. Jun 2025, 00:21:33
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <rs3vgl-3voc.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : tin/2.6.2-20220130 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.0-140-lowlatency (x86_64))
In sci.physics Bertitaylor <
bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Sun, 1 Jun 2025 22:08:03 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Sun, 1 Jun 2025 17:53:52 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote:
>
Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>
On Tue, 27 May 2025 10:52:13 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote:
>
Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> wrote:
[-]
It has never been done because the equations that describe such an
apparatus clearly show using low voltage is blazingly stupid and you are
the first person stupid enough to do it.
>
FYI, the root problem with Arindam is that he denies Newton's third law.
>
Right. Under certain situations as in Arindam's new design rail gun the
first and third laws of motion are violated.
>
Yes, that's why it doesn't work as advertised.
>
Arindam's rail gun exists in his garden shed in dismantled form.
>
As well it should...
Easy to reassemble. Its job is over, as proving itself a new invention
demonstrating a new effect.
The only things it proved are you know nothing about how to perform an
experiment, the well known equations that define the thing you were
attempting to build or the basic laws of Newtonian motion, crackpot.
-- penninojim@yahoo.com
Re: The Orange One
Re: The Orange One