Sujet : Re: What is a photon
De : hertz778 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (rhertz)
Groupes : sci.physics sci.physics.relativityDate : 04. Jun 2025, 16:45:22
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <56584f208e1fd12fd0ab6e61d4700b71@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 13:10:58 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 03.06.2025 13:48, skrev rhertz:
On Tue, 3 Jun 2025 11:22:38 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
>
Den 02.06.2025 05:16, skrev Bertietaylor:
On 01/06/2025 12:46, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
Den 01.06.2025 12:03, skrev bertitaylor:
A photon is a brief electromagnetic wave pulse travelling a light
speed
in the medium of aether.
>
>
>
Experiments show that the speed of light is invariant: [...]
How is that possible if light is waves in an aether ?
>
>
Speed of light has to be variant in the Copernican model. Light is a
wave. All waves need media to propagate. Light's medium is aether.
>
A bit confused, Bertietaylor?
The Copernican model is wrong, the Sun isn't the centre of the Universe.
And in 1543 Copernicus knew nothing about the speed of light.
>
You obviously meant to refer to the "Copenhagen interpretation",
that is the interpretation of quantum mechanics given
by Bohr and Heisenberg in ~1925.
>
Modern quantum fields theories such as QED are based on SR.
In QED light is a particle and the speed of light is invariant.
>
But forget quantum theories, it is irrelevant to the question
if the speed of light is invariant.
>
Many experiments are performed to answer the question.
A few of them:
>
https://paulba.no/paper/Kennedy_Thorndike.pdf
https://paulba.no/paper/Michelson_1913.pdf
https://paulba.no/paper/Alvager_et_al.pdf
https://paulba.no/paper/Babcock_Bergman.pdf
https://paulba.no/paper/Brecher.pdf
>
The result is that it is thoroughly confirmed that
the speed of light is invariant.
>
>
>
Paul, retarded narcissist & relativist.
>
>
>
Forget any local experiment (within the Solar System) about the
constancy of
the speed of light.
>
Does that mean that you accept that light is invariant
in the Solar system, but not outside our galaxy?
>
BTW, "invariant" doesn't really mean constant,
it means independent of frames of reference.
For example: mass is invariant, but not always constant.
(But the speed of light is constant _and_ invariant.)
>
>
Come here when you can show off with ONE EXPERIMENT AT GALACTIC
DISTANCE, like
OWLS or TWLS between some planet in a random star system at Andromeda,
to the least.
>
>
Or get proofs for that assertion between another random planet at ESO
6-1 or
NGC 5237, close to the Milky Way.
>
WHAT? You can't wait some million years? No shit.
>
>
Then SHUT UP! SHUT THE FUCK UP, IMBECILE!
>
Watch your blood pressure, Richard. :-D
THE SPEED OF LIGHT, ALONG THE ENTIRE UNIVERSE, IS RANDOMLY VARIANT
(MAXWELL SAID THAT, WITH THE PERMITTIVITY AND PERMEABILITY SHIT), AND I
BET THAT HAS VALUES ABOVE OR BENEATH c IN DIFFERENT PARTS OF IT, HUNDRED
OF MILLIONS LY FAR AWAY.
EVERY STUPID AND ARROGANT AFFIRMATION, ON WHICH ASTRONOMY/COSMOLOGY IS
BASED TODAY, IS JUST ANOTHER LAYER ON THE PILE OF CRAP THAT SCIENCE IS.
ONLY ENGINEERING MADE THE WORLD WHAT IT IS. FUCK RELATIVISTIC
PHYSICISTS.